Finding General Solutions: Separation of Variables - AP Calculus AB
- A quantity changes with by . What is the general solution? Answer: This differential equation is perfectly suited for separation of variables. We can rearrange it as , placing all y terms on the left and all x terms on the right. Integrating both sides gives , which simplifies to . Exponentiating both sides yields . Since we typically work with in these contexts and is an arbitrary constant, we write the general solution as . Choice A incorrectly integrates as if y were a constant rather than the dependent variable. When you see a differential equation where the derivative equals a product with one factor containing only x and another containing only y, separation of variables is your go-to method.
- A function satisfies . What is the general solution for ? Answer: This problem requires solving a differential equation using separation of variables. For dy/dx = 2 x y, separate as dy/y = 2 x dx, assuming y ≠ 0. Integrate: ln|y| = + C. Exponentiate to y = C . The distractor y = + C fails by not using a multiplicative constant. To recognize separable equations, look for the form dy/dx = f(x) g(y), which allows rewriting as (1/g(y)) dy = f(x) dx for integration.
- A model satisfies . What is the general solution for ? Answer: This differential equation uses separation of variables with a rational function. Starting with , we separate to get . To integrate the right side, note that , so . This gives . Exponentiating yields , which becomes where . Choice C omits the arbitrary constant. When integrating rational functions of the form , recognize this as a logarithmic derivative pattern.
- A cooling object satisfies . What is the general solution for ? Answer: This Newton's Law of Cooling equation dT/dt = 4(T-10) requires separation of variables after recognizing the shifted form. We can rewrite this as dT/dt = 4T - 40, and to separate variables, we need dT/(T-10) = 4dt. Integrating both sides gives ln|T-10| = 4t + C₁. Exponentiating yields |T-10| = = , where C = ±₁. Solving for T gives T = 10 + , which is the general solution. Choice B incorrectly places the 10 as -10 outside the exponential term, which would give dT/dt = ≠ 4(T-10). When dealing with shifted exponential models like dT/dt = k(T-a), the solution is always T = a + , not - a.
- A radioactive sample satisfies . What is the general solution for ? Answer: This radioactive decay equation dA/dt = -A/5 is solved using separation of variables. Separating the variables gives us dA/A = -dt/5, dividing both sides by A and multiplying by dt. Integrating both sides yields ln|A| = -t/5 + C₁, where C₁ is the constant of integration. Exponentiating both sides gives |A| = = ₁ · , which simplifies to A = where C = ±₁ is an arbitrary constant. Choice E incorrectly has a positive exponent , which would represent exponential growth rather than the decay indicated by the negative coefficient in the differential equation. When the coefficient of the dependent variable is negative in dA/dt = kA, the solution always involves with k negative.
- A function satisfies . What is the general solution? Answer: This differential equation requires separation of variables. We multiply both sides by y and dx to get , separating the variables. Integrating both sides gives us , which evaluates to . This is the general solution in implicit form. Choice A incorrectly computes the integral of as instead of , forgetting to divide by 3. When separating variables leads to polynomial integrands on both sides, carefully apply the power rule and don't forget the constants that arise from integration.
- A culture grows so that . What is the general solution for as a function of ? Answer: This problem requires separation of variables to solve the differential equation . To separate variables, we divide both sides by and multiply by , giving us . Integrating both sides yields , where is an arbitrary constant. Exponentiating both sides gives , which we can write as where is an arbitrary constant. Choice D incorrectly stops at the logarithmic form without exponentiating to solve for . When you see a differential equation of the form , recognize it as exponential growth/decay and expect a solution .
- A spring model gives for . What is the general solution? Answer: This differential equation dy/dx = y/(1+x) is solved using separation of variables. Separating gives us dy/y = dx/(1+x), with y terms on the left and x terms on the right. Integrating both sides yields ln|y| = ln|1+x| + C₁, where we recognize that the integral of 1/(1+x) is ln|1+x|. Using logarithm properties, we can write ln|y| = ln|1+x| + ln|C| = ln|C(1+x)|, where C = ₁. Exponentiating gives y = C(1+x), which is the general solution. Choice B incorrectly suggests y = ln(1+x) + C, but this would give dy/dx = 1/(1+x), not y/(1+x) as required. Remember that when integrating gives matching logarithmic forms, the solution often involves the arguments of those logarithms in a product.
- A function satisfies . What is the general solution for ? Answer: This problem requires solving a differential equation using separation of variables. For dy/dx = x y, separate as dy/y = x dx, assuming y ≠ 0. Integrate: ln|y| = ()/2 + C. Exponentiate to y = C . The distractor y = + C fails by adding C outside, not as a multiplier. To recognize separable equations, look for the form dy/dx = f(x) g(y), which allows rewriting as (1/g(y)) dy = f(x) dx for integration.
- A variable satisfies for . What is the general solution? Answer: This problem requires solving a differential equation using separation of variables. For dy/dx = (2/x) y with x ≠ 0, separate as dy/y = (2/x) dx, assuming y ≠ 0. Integrate: ln|y| = 2 ln|x| + C. Simplify to y = C , absorbing constants. The distractor y = 2 ln|x| + C fails by not exponentiating properly, yielding a logarithmic form instead of power. To recognize separable equations, look for the form dy/dx = f(x) g(y), which allows rewriting as (1/g(y)) dy = f(x) dx for integration.
- A quantity satisfies . What is the general solution? Answer: This problem requires solving a differential equation using separation of variables. For dy/dx = y / (1 + ), separate as dy/y = dx/(1 + ), assuming y ≠ 0. Integrate: ln|y| = arctan(x) + C. Exponentiate to y = C . The distractor y = + C fails by not incorporating the multiplicative constant from exponentiation. To recognize separable equations, look for the form dy/dx = f(x) g(y), which allows rewriting as (1/g(y)) dy = f(x) dx for integration.
- A function satisfies . What is the general solution for ? Answer: This problem requires solving a differential equation using separation of variables. For with x ≠ 0, separate as , assuming y ≠ 0. Integrate: . Simplify to . The distractor fails by not completing the exponentiation step. To recognize separable equations, look for the form , which allows rewriting as for integration.
- A population satisfies . What is the general solution for ? Answer: This problem requires solving a differential equation using separation of variables. Given dP/dt = P/4, separate as dP/P = (1/4) dt, assuming P ≠ 0. Integrate to get ln|P| = (t/4) + C. Exponentiate for P = . The choice P = + C is incorrect because it adds a constant outside the exponential, unlike the proper form from integration. To recognize separable equations, look for the form dy/dx = f(x) g(y), which allows rewriting as (1/g(y)) dy = f(x) dx for integration.
- A quantity satisfies . What is the general solution for ? Answer: This differential equation is a classic separation of variables problem. We rearrange to get , separating y terms and x terms. Integrating both sides gives us , which evaluates to , or . Solving for y, we multiply both sides by -1 and take the reciprocal: . Choice A has the wrong sign, while choice C leaves the solution in implicit form rather than solving for y. When you encounter where n ≠ 1, separation of variables followed by the power rule for integration will lead you to the general solution.
- A bacteria count satisfies . What is the general solution for ? Answer: To solve using separation of variables, we divide by and multiply by to get . Integrating gives . Exponentiating yields , which simplifies to where . Choice B incorrectly uses a positive exponent, ignoring the negative sign in the original differential equation. The negative coefficient indicates bacterial decay, which must result in a negative exponent in the exponential solution.
- A function satisfies . What is the general solution relating and ? Answer: This differential equation is ideal for separation of variables. We multiply both sides by y and dx to get , successfully separating the variables. Integrating both sides gives us , which evaluates to . This is already in its simplest form as the general solution. Choice C incorrectly omits the factor of that comes from integrating y, while choice D would result from incorrectly treating this as instead. The key insight is that when dy/dx equals a function of y in the denominator, multiply both sides by y before integrating to properly separate variables.
- A motion model satisfies for . What is the general solution for ? Answer: This differential equation uses separation of variables with a rational function coefficient. From , we separate to get . Integrating both sides gives , using the fact that . Exponentiating yields , which becomes where for . Choice A incorrectly integrates as if it were multiplying v directly. When you encounter , the solution often involves powers of x rather than exponentials.
- A function satisfies for . What is the general solution? Answer: This problem requires solving a differential equation using separation of variables. Given dy/dx = 2 y / sqrt(x) for x > 0, separate as dy/y = 2 dx / sqrt(x), assuming y ≠ 0. Integrate to ln|y| = 4 sqrt(x) + C. Exponentiate for y = C . The choice y = + C is incorrect as it doesn't multiply by C. To recognize separable equations, look for the form dy/dx = f(x) g(y), which allows rewriting as (1/g(y)) dy = f(x) dx for integration.
- A function satisfies . What is the general solution? Answer: This differential equation requires separation of variables to solve. We multiply both sides by y and dx to get , successfully separating the variables. Integrating both sides gives us , which evaluates to . Multiplying through by 2, we get , and since is just another arbitrary constant, we write the general solution as . Choice B would incorrectly suggest that y and x are linearly related, missing the quadratic nature revealed by integration. When the derivative is a ratio with x in the numerator and y in the denominator, cross-multiply before integrating to properly separate variables.
- A model satisfies . What is the general solution for ? Answer: This differential equation uses separation of variables with a trigonometric integral. From , we separate to get . Integrating both sides gives , since . Exponentiating yields , which becomes where . Choice C omits the arbitrary constant C, giving only a particular solution rather than the general solution. Always include the arbitrary constant when finding general solutions to differential equations.