Factor & Remainder Theorems - Algebra 3
- When is divided by , the quotient is and the remainder is 4. What is ? Answer: From the division statement, . Thus . Choice A is the remainder; choice C is the value of at without adding 4; choice B is a common expansion error.
- Which of the following is the complete factorization of over the integers? Answer: When you see a quartic polynomial to factor over the integers, your first move should be the Rational Root Theorem: test factors of the constant term, , so . Here, and , so and are factors. Dividing by gives , and dividing that cubic by again gives . This quadratic factors as . Pulling it all together, . That is the complete integer factorization. Now look at the wrong choices. would require and to be roots, but and , so this is just a mismatch of roots. includes the correct and two factors, but the extra is not a factor, and you would be missing one ; checking rules it out. Finally, gets the repeated right but replaces with , and proves is not a factor. Your takeaway: for factoring polynomials over the integers, systematically test rational roots and divide until you reach a quadratic. This prevents both missing repeated factors and inventing roots that don't actually satisfy the polynomial.
- The polynomial has real coefficients and is a zero. Which of the following is the complete factorization of over the real numbers? Answer: Because the coefficients are real, is also a zero, so is a factor. Dividing by gives . Choice A has the wrong sign in the quadratic factor; choice B includes complex factors and the wrong real root; choice C uses instead of .
- Let be a polynomial. When is divided by , the remainder is 5, and . What is the remainder when is divided by ? Answer: The remainder must be linear, so write . Since , . Since , . Solving gives and . Choice A has a sign error; choice C swaps the coefficients; choice D overlooks that the two values determine the linear remainder.
- What is the remainder when is divided by ? Answer: Whenever you see "remainder when a polynomial is divided by ," think of the Remainder Theorem: the remainder is just the polynomial evaluated at the root of the divisor. Since gives , you need to compute for . Now evaluate carefully. , because 100 is even. , because 49 is odd. So That is the remainder, so the correct answer is . The other choices come from common sign or evaluation slips. The choice is what you get if you mistakenly plug in , since ; remember, means , not . The choice likely comes from thinking , which would give ; but any even power of is positive . The choice may come from only handling the first term, or forgetting that adds and then adds another . Your study tip: for division by , evaluate the polynomial at . For , use . Always check the parity of the exponents — even powers of are , odd powers are . This will make remainder questions quick and reliable.
- Let . If is a factor of , what is the remainder when is divided by ? Answer: Since is a factor, , so , giving . Then , and the remainder when divided by is . The value is a sign error; would mean is a factor; is before solving for .
- A cubic polynomial has zeros , , and . If , which of the following could be ? Answer: When you see a cubic with given zeros, remember each zero corresponds to a factor . So zeros mean the factored form must contain . The multiplier in front is then determined by . The choice has exactly the correct factors. Checking : , which matches . So this is the correct polynomial. Now look at why the others fail. The choice has zeros , not , so it's not even the right root set. The choice has the correct zeros, but the leading multiplier is , so , not . The choice gives zeros , missing the zero and incorrectly including . So each wrong choice either misidentifies a sign in a factor or misapplies the multiplier. A strong strategy: first write the factors straight from the zeros, then evaluate at to solve for the leading coefficient. Also watch signs carefully: a zero of requires , not . This avoids both root errors and constant errors.
- Suppose and are factors of . What is the value of ? Answer: Whenever you see linear factors of a polynomial, use the factor theorem: if is a factor, then . So and . Since is a monic cubic and already has two linear factors, the third factor must be . Multiplying the constant terms gives , so , meaning . Thus Now evaluate: The value would be correct only if were a factor, but the third factor is , not . The value is a sign error: at , all three factors are positive, so must be positive; the negative constant term does not make the value negative. The value is just the constant term, or its absolute value, and it ignores the contributions of the cubic and quadratic terms when evaluating . A good habit: once you know the factors, multiply them out or compare constants to find the missing factor before evaluating.
- Let . If and , which of the following is the complete factorization of ? Answer: From , . From , , so . Solving gives and . Then . The other choices have incorrect zero sets.
- If polynomial has remainder when divided by , what is the remainder when is divided by ? Answer: When you see "remainder when divided by ," the key is the Remainder Theorem: the remainder equals the polynomial evaluated at . So is given. For , evaluate the whole expression at : Thus the remainder is . Now, the traps: the choice treats the added as if it doesn't change the remainder; that would only be true if it were divisible by , but at , contributes . The choice correctly evaluates , but then forgets to add , leaving out the original remainder. The choice might come from multiplying the original remainder by , or from subtracting instead of adding it; either way, it reverses the needed sign or overweights the given information. A useful habit: anytime a question asks for a remainder after division by a linear term, plug the root into the whole expression. For sums like , just evaluate . And be careful to include both contributions—do not forget the given value.
- Which polynomial has as a factor but does NOT have as a factor? Answer: Whenever you see "has a factor" on a polynomial question, your first move should be the factor theorem: if is a factor, then plugging into the polynomial gives . Here you need for to be a factor, and for not to be a factor. Test the polynomial . At , you get , so is a factor. At , you get , not , so is not a factor. That matches the requirement. Now look at the others. gives at both and , so it has both factors. The same is true for , which also gives at both. The remaining choice, , gives at and at , so it has but not — the opposite of what is asked. The quick takeaway: on factor questions, don't start factoring the whole polynomial. Plug the candidate roots into the polynomial. A zero means the factor exists; a nonzero value means it doesn't. Checking and alone will separate these choices instantly.
- A monic quartic polynomial with real coefficients has zeros , , and , and . What is the fourth zero? Answer: Write . Then , so . Choice A is a sign error; choice B repeats a known zero; choice D would give .
- A cubic polynomial has zeros and , and . Which of the following is the factored form of ? Answer: Since and are zeros, . Then , so and . Choice B gives ; choice C has zeros ; choice D has zeros .
- A student claims that if is a cubic polynomial with leading coefficient 1, , and , then . Which statement correctly diagnoses the claim? Answer: The third factor could be any linear factor , so the two zeros do not determine a unique cubic polynomial. The Factor Theorem guarantees that and are factors, but the remaining factor is for an arbitrary real number . Without more information, the third zero cannot be identified. Choice A incorrectly assumes uniqueness; choice C makes a sign error; choice D misstates the Factor Theorem.
- Let . How many distinct real zeros does have? Answer: Factoring gives , so the real zeros are (with multiplicity 2), , and . Counted distinctly, that is 3 zeros. Counting twice gives 4; missing one of the other zeros gives 1 or 2.
- What is the remainder when is divided by ? Answer: Since the divisor is quadratic, the remainder is linear: . By the Remainder Theorem, and . Compute and . Thus and , so , and the remainder is . The value is , is a sign-error value, and satisfies only , not .
- If is a factor of , what is the value of ? Answer: When you see "factor of a polynomial," you're being tested on the factor theorem: if is a factor, then gives a root, so must make the polynomial equal zero. Plug that into : Simplify carefully: Combine the numbers: . So: Now, why the others are traps. **** comes from solving incorrectly — forgetting the negative sign. **** might result from misreading the root as or fumbling the fraction arithmetic. **** usually appears when you accidentally substitute instead of , or when you lose track of signs in the coefficients. All of them would fail the factor theorem: only makes . Study tip: Whenever a linear factor like is given, immediately solve for the root and substitute it into the polynomial, setting it equal to zero. Then write out every fraction step — sign errors are the most common trap on this type of question. If you get a non-integer, don't panic; simplify methodically and you'll land on the right value.
- Let . If is a factor of , what is the quotient when is divided by ? Answer: When you see " is a factor," use the factor theorem: must equal . That tells you the unknown coefficient before you divide. Compute , so and . Thus . Now divide by using synthetic division with : bring down ; ; ; ; . The quotient is built from coefficients , giving The choices ending in — and — treat the final term with the wrong sign: the remainder is , so the last quotient term must be , not . The choice has the wrong -coefficient: the step gives , not . A quick check: multiplies back to . On this exam, when a factor is given, first plug the root into to find any unknown coefficient, then use synthetic division. The coefficients of the quotient come directly from the bottom row.
- Suppose is a factor of . Which of the following must be a factor of ? Answer: Whenever you're told that is a factor of , the Factor Theorem is your key: is a factor exactly when . So here you know . Now the polynomial in the question is , so ask: what value of makes the input equal to ? Solve , which gives . Therefore , so must be a factor of . That is the correct choice. . The choice is a tempting trap: you might copy the original factor unchanged. But plugging into the composed expression gives , not , so it does not have to be a factor. The choice would require , making the input , and you're not guaranteed that . Similarly, would require , making the input , and no information guarantees . Those could be factors only if happened to have other specific roots, but they are not forced by the given fact. . Strategy: when a factor of is given and you're asked about , transform the known root through that expression: set the linear expression equal to the known root and solve for . The root shifts, but the factor does not stay the same.
- A degree-4 polynomial satisfies and . Which statement must be true? Answer: is a factor of , but is not. When you see a polynomial value like , your first thought should be the Factor Theorem: if , then is a factor. Here, , so is definitely a factor. At the same time, tells you that is not a factor. Therefore the statement that must be true is exactly: " is a factor of , but is not." The degree being 4 simply means there are two more factors you don't know about; it doesn't force either of the missing factors. Now look at the wrong answers. The claim that both and are factors cannot be true, because directly rules out as a factor. Similarly, the statement that " is a factor, while is not" fails because the first part is false. Finally, " is a factor" is impossible, since ; for that to be a factor, both and would have to be factors, and you already know is not. Your study tip: whenever a question gives you a value like or , immediately write down which factor is confirmed and which factor is ruled out. Then translate compound factors like back into their linear pieces before deciding whether they can be factors. This avoids the common trap of assuming a degree-4 polynomial must include every nice-looking factor.