Exponential Functions & Graphs - Algebra 3
- Let . Which statement about is true? Answer: is increasing, has range , and its x-intercept is . Rewrite . As increases, decreases, so increases. As , , so the range is . Setting gives , so , hence . The other choices reverse the sign in the log equation or falsely claim there is no x-intercept.
- The value of a machine, in dollars, is modeled by , where is years since purchase. The value eventually approaches ($300), the initial value is , and after one year the value is . What are and ? Answer: As , , so the limiting value ($300) gives . The initial value gives , so . Checking : . Using treats the initial value as the coefficient; uses the first-year drop as the asymptote; ignores the limiting value.
- The graph of is horizontally stretched by a factor of 2. Which equation defines the transformed function ? Answer: When you see a transformation like a horizontal stretch, remember that it affects the input variable inside the function, not the output. A horizontal stretch by a factor of 2 means every point moves twice as far from the -axis, so the same -value occurs at a larger . To achieve that, you replace with in the original function. Thus, becomes . Check with a point: originally . After stretching, that -value should appear at , and indeed . So the correct choice is . Now look at the traps. The choice is a horizontal compression by a factor of —it makes the graph narrower, not wider. The choice is a vertical stretch by 2, which multiplies the output, not the input. The choice represents a horizontal shift to the right by 2 units, moving the graph without stretching it. Each of these confuses the direction or type of transformation. A solid strategy: for any horizontal transformation, always think about what happens to a single point. If the graph is stretched by factor , then becomes . And remember, horizontal changes are the opposite of what intuition suggests—larger factor means dividing, not multiplying.
- A student claims that because , the graph of is above the graph of for every real . Which statement best corrects the student's claim? Answer: The graphs intersect only at ; is below for and above for . At , , so the graphs intersect. Since , the ratio is less than 1 for and greater than 1 for ; because , is below for negative and above for positive . The other choices ignore the negative interval, assert a false second intersection, or deny the intersection at .
- The function is defined by . Which of the following correctly describes its graph? Answer: It is the graph of shifted 3 units right and 4 units up; its horizontal asymptote is , and its y-intercept is . Whenever you see an exponential written as , think of the general transformation form . Here , so replacing with shifts the graph 3 units to the right; , so the graph shifts 4 units up, and the horizontal asymptote moves to . Checking the -intercept: , which confirms the correct description. The "shifted 3 units left and 4 units up" version misreads the exponent sign: is right, not left. The "shifted 3 units right and 4 units down" version gets the horizontal shift right, but a outside would be needed for down; that would put the asymptote at and -intercept at . The "shifted 3 units left and 4 units down" version has both wrong shift directions, though its asymptote and intercept do match a downward shift of , not of . So the reliable quick check is to identify and from : right/up for positive , and always plug in to verify the -intercept. That catches nearly every trap in these exponential transformation questions.
- The graph of is reflected across the x-axis and then translated 1 unit up. Which statement about the resulting graph is true? Answer: Its horizontal asymptote is , its y-intercept is 0, and its range is . Whenever you see an exponential function being transformed, track three features step-by-step: the horizontal asymptote, the y-intercept, and the range. Start with , which has asymptote , y-intercept , and range . Reflecting across the x-axis gives : the asymptote stays , the y-intercept becomes , and the range flips to . Translating up 1 unit gives . So the asymptote moves to , the y-intercept becomes , and since is always negative, is always less than . Thus the range is . The choice with asymptote , y-intercept , and range is correct. The choice saying asymptote and range treats the translation as a shift down instead of up, or confuses which reflection was applied. The choice with y-intercept and range likely reflects across the y-axis instead of the x-axis, or forgets the reflection entirely. The remaining choice with asymptote and y-intercept combines those errors, keeping the original y-intercept while misplacing the asymptote. A reliable study tip: apply transformations in order, and check one anchor point plus the asymptote. If the graph is reflected across the x-axis, the range flips below the asymptote; a vertical translation then shifts both the asymptote and the range boundary.
- Let . Which statement about the graph of is true? Answer: It is increasing, has range , and passes through the origin. Since , is increasing. As , , so , giving range . At , , so the graph passes through the origin. The wrong choices reverse monotonicity, deny the x-intercept, or state the range incorrectly.
- The graph of , where , , and , passes through and . What is ? Answer: When you see an exponential function like and two points, think: the point with gives you the coefficient directly, because . Here, tells you . Then plug the other point into : , so , and since and , you get . Now the function is , so . Why are the other choices traps? is the slope of the line through the two given points—a classic mistake if you treat the curve as linear instead of exponential. comes from taking the geometric mean of and (which gives ) but forgetting the negative sign—the true value is . appears if you mistakenly square the coefficient: using instead of . Key strategy: for any exponential function, the y-intercept (where ) always reveals , and a second point solves for the base . Then evaluate at the requested . Also, always check the sign of —it tells you whether the outputs are positive or negative. Here, since is negative, must be negative, so you can immediately rule out and .
- For , which single transformation of the graph of produces a decreasing exponential function whose y-intercept is the same as that of ? Answer: Reflect across the y-axis. Reflecting across the y-axis gives , which is decreasing and has y-intercept , the same as . A horizontal shift changes the y-intercept, and reflecting across the x-axis gives y-intercept .
- The graph of is shifted 2 units left and 3 units down to produce the graph of . Which point on the graph of corresponds to which point on the graph of ? Answer: corresponds to When you see a transformation question, think about what happens to a single point: shifting left or down means subtracting from the corresponding coordinate. The graph of contains the point because . A shift 2 units left moves the x-coordinate from 0 to . A shift 3 units down moves the y-coordinate from 1 to . So corresponds to . The choice correctly moves down 3 but moves right instead of left, treating "left" as adding to x. The choice correctly moves left 2 but moves up instead of down, treating "down" as adding to y. The choice reverses both directions, as if the shift were right 2 and up 3. Each wrong option comes from mixing up the signs of the coordinate shifts. A useful habit: for a horizontal shift, "left" means subtract from x-coordinates, even though the function rule uses inside. For a vertical shift, "down" means subtract from y-coordinates. Always test with a known point like the y-intercept , and translate its coordinates directly by the shift. That will keep you from confusing the equation form with the actual movement of the graph.
- Let , with and . Which statement must be true about the graph of ? Answer: It is decreasing, has horizontal asymptote , and has exactly one x-intercept. Because , as increases the term decreases, so is decreasing. As , , so the horizontal asymptote is . Since , the range is , which contains 0, so continuity gives exactly one x-intercept. The wrong choices misstate the asymptote, monotonicity, or existence of an intercept.
- A single horizontal shift of produces the same graph as . Which shift is it? Answer: Shift right 1 unit. Using , . This is with replaced by , so the same graph results from shifting right 1 unit. The other options come from ignoring the coefficient or using the wrong direction.
- Let and . Which statement about the graph of is true? Answer: is decreasing, has y-intercept , horizontal asymptote , and range . Since has horizontal asymptote , has asymptote . At , , so . Because is increasing, is decreasing, and its range is . The choices that claim increasing, y-intercept , or asymptote misapply the reflection or vertical shift.
- Which of the following functions is increasing for all real x and has a horizontal asymptote below the x-axis? Answer: Whenever you see an exponential function in the form , focus on three features: the base , the leading coefficient , and the constant . The horizontal asymptote is , and the function is increasing when and have the same sign. For , that means ; for , that means . The function has and , so it is increasing for all real . Its constant term is , so the horizontal asymptote is , which is below the -axis. Thus it satisfies both conditions. The choice has the correct asymptote , but its coefficient is negative, so it is decreasing rather than increasing. Similarly, decreases because the base is less than 1 while the coefficient is positive. The function is actually increasing, since a negative coefficient with a base less than 1 makes the derivative positive, but its asymptote is , above the -axis, so it fails the asymptote requirement. A quick study tip: check the constant term for the asymptote's location, then check the sign of the coefficient and whether the base is greater or less than 1 to determine increasing or decreasing behavior.
- Which function is decreasing for all and has no x-intercept? Answer: is decreasing and has range , so it never reaches 0. crosses the x-axis at ; is increasing; and crosses the x-axis at .
- Starting with , apply these transformations in order: reflect across the y-axis, shift right 2 units, reflect across the x-axis, shift up 3 units. Which equation defines the resulting function? Answer: Reflecting across the y-axis gives . Shifting right 2 replaces by , giving . Reflecting across the x-axis and shifting up 3 gives . The other formulas omit the y-axis reflection, shift in the wrong direction, or both.
- The graph of is reflected across the y-axis and then shifted up 2 units. Which equation defines the resulting graph? Answer: When you see a transformation question involving exponential functions, ask yourself two things: what does a reflection across the -axis do to the input, and does a vertical shift add outside the function? Start by rewriting as , because . Reflecting across the -axis replaces every with , so . Then shifting up 2 units means adding 2 to the entire output, giving . That is the correct resulting graph. The choice shows the original graph shifted up but never reflected — it is still decreasing. The choice has the correct reflection but shifts down instead of up, moving the graph in the wrong vertical direction. The choice combines both errors: it keeps the original decreasing shape and shifts down. Each wrong answer represents a common slip: forgetting that already contains a negative exponent, confusing which sign means reflect across the -axis, or mixing up the direction of a vertical shift. A strong strategy is to rewrite exponential bases like as before transforming. Then apply reflections to the exponent and vertical shifts to the whole expression. Finally, test a point: for , the original , and after reflection and shifting up, , matching . This quick check catches most transformation mistakes.
- Which of the following functions has a graph identical to ? Answer: Whenever you see an exponential expression like , your first move should be to rewrite it using exponent rules. The key identity is . Here, that means . So the function with the identical graph is the one written as : it is just a vertical stretch of the parent exponential by a factor of 4, which produces the same curve as shifting left by 2 units. Now look at the traps. The choice adds 2 to the output, producing a vertical shift upward, not a horizontal shift left. The choice uses , which changes the base's growth rate entirely, so its graph is different. Similarly, is really ; it has a different exponent coefficient and is not equivalent to . A reliable study tip: whenever you compare exponential functions, rewrite everything into a common form like or before deciding. Watch especially for the difference between "add to the exponent" and "add to the value"—multiplication by a constant in the exponent becomes multiplication by a power, never addition outside the exponent.
- A function of the form has horizontal asymptote . Its graph contains and , and is decreasing. What are and ? Answer: The asymptote gives . From , , so . From , , so . Since the function is decreasing, . Choosing treats as if it were ; choosing uses the y-intercept as the coefficient; would make the function increasing.
- A population of bacteria doubles every 3 hours. If the initial population is 500, which function models the population after hours, and after how many hours does the population reach 4000? Answer: ; 9 hours Whenever you see exponential growth like "doubles every ___ hours," first identify the doubling period and express time as the number of periods. Here the bacteria double every 3 hours, so after hours there are doubling periods. Each period multiplies the population by 2, so the model is . To reach 4000, solve . Dividing gives . Since , you need , so hours. Now the wrong choices. The function would mean doublings after hours—that is, doubling every hour, not every 3 hours. If you solve it, you get hour, but that answer depends on the incorrect function. The choice with "3 hours" has the correct model but stops too soon: at 3 hours the population is , not 4000. It actually takes three 3-hour periods, or 9 hours, to double three times. The remaining option, with "3 hours," combines both errors: it grows far too fast, and at 3 hours it would give , not 4000. A good habit is to check the exponent: for a doubling every hours, use , not . Then test your function at one known time, such as , before solving for a target population.