- Which simpler sentence should Jay use?
Answer: The door is at the back of the building.
When you need to replace a word you don't know, look for a simpler word or phrase that means the exact same thing and gives the listener the same directions. Here, Jay needs a substitute for "rear," which means the back side of something. The goal is to keep the meaning identical while using everyday language.
"The back of the building" is a perfect match for "the rear of the building" — both point to the same location. So D, "The door is at the back of the building," is the correct replacement. It's clear, simple, and gives the visitor the right directions.
The other options all change the meaning in ways that would send the visitor to the wrong place. A says the door is "beside" the building, which suggests it's next to or alongside the building — that doesn't make sense, since a door is part of a building, not sitting next to it. B says the door is "inside" the building, which is also confusing — a visitor needs to find the entrance from the outside, and this wording doesn't help them locate it. C says the door is "across from" the building, which means on the opposite side of a street or space — this would send the visitor away from the clinic entirely.
A helpful strategy: when replacing an unfamiliar word, ask yourself, "Does this new phrase point to the exact same thing?" Wrong answer choices on these questions often use words like "beside," "inside," or "across from" that sound related to location but mean something completely different from what you intend.
- Which simpler sentence keeps Ana's full message?
Answer: I can do your work, but I must stop at six.
When a sentence needs to be simplified, your job is to find the version that keeps all parts of the original meaning — nothing added, nothing removed. Ana's message has two key parts: (1) she can cover the shift, and (2) she can only do it until six o'clock. A good replacement sentence must carry both ideas.
Choice A says, "I can do your work, but I must stop at six." This preserves both pieces of Ana's message — she's agreeing to help, but setting a clear end time. "Must stop at six" mirrors "only until six." This is the correct answer.
Choice B says, "I can do your work if you leave at six." This changes the meaning entirely. It makes covering the shift conditional on the coworker leaving at six, which is not what Ana said. Ana's limit is about her own availability, not the coworker's schedule.
Choice C says, "I can start your work after six." This is the opposite of Ana's message. Ana can help before six, not after — so this completely reverses her meaning.
Choice D says, "I can do your work for six hours." This introduces a new detail — a six-hour duration — that Ana never mentioned. Saying "until six" is a specific end time, not a number of hours.
A useful strategy: treat simplification questions like a checklist. Write down each key idea in the original sentence, then check whether the answer choice includes all of them and only them. If anything is missing, flipped, or added, it's the wrong choice.
- Which simpler sentence gives Mina's full meaning?
Answer: This medicine makes me sleepy.
When you don't know a word, the best replacement is one that captures the same meaning — not just a word that sounds related or fits the same sentence structure. Here, you need to find the word that means the same thing as "drowsy."
"Drowsy" means feeling like you want to sleep — your eyes feel heavy, and you have trouble staying awake. Medicines, especially cold or allergy medicines, often cause this feeling. Answer A, "sleepy," is the correct replacement because "sleepy" and "drowsy" describe exactly the same feeling. If you swapped them in any sentence, the meaning would stay the same: This medicine makes me want to sleep.
The other choices describe real side effects of medicine, but they are different feelings entirely. Answer B, "dizzy," means feeling like the room is spinning or that you might fall — that is not what "drowsy" means. Answer C, "sick," is too vague and usually means feeling ill in your stomach or body overall — again, not the same as wanting to sleep. Answer D, "weak," means having no strength or energy in your muscles — closer in feel, but still not the same as sleepiness.
The trap here is that B, C, and D are all things medicine can sometimes make you feel, so they seem like reasonable answers. Always ask yourself: does this word mean the same thing, or just something related?
A helpful tip: when replacing an unfamiliar word, test your choice by swapping it directly into the sentence and asking, "Does this sentence still mean the same thing?" Only A passes that test here.
- Which simpler sentence keeps Ben's exact meaning?
Answer: I cannot eat any food with peanuts.
When a word feels too hard to say or remember, you can swap it for simpler words — as long as the meaning stays exactly the same. That's the key skill this question is testing: finding a replacement sentence that matches the original idea perfectly, with nothing added, removed, or changed.
The original sentence means Ben cannot eat food that holds or includes peanuts as an ingredient. The word "contains" simply means "has something inside it." So Ben needs a sentence that says he cannot eat food that has peanuts in it.
Answer A — "I cannot eat any food with peanuts" — is correct. The phrase "with peanuts" means the food includes peanuts, which matches "contains peanuts" exactly. It also keeps the key word "cannot eat," preserving the idea that this is something he is unable to do, not just something he dislikes.
Answer B is wrong because "peanuts by themselves" changes the meaning entirely. Ben isn't talking about eating plain peanuts — he's talking about peanuts as an ingredient hidden inside other food.
Answer C is wrong in two ways: it changes "cannot" to "do not want" (a preference, not a restriction), and "near peanuts" means peanuts are physically close — not inside the food. That's a different idea.
Answer D is wrong because "do not like" expresses a personal preference. Ben's original sentence says he cannot eat peanuts, which suggests a health reason like an allergy — much stronger than simply not liking something.
Study tip: Always check two things when replacing a sentence: does the action match, and does the reason match? Both must stay the same.
- Which simpler sentence keeps both parts of Sam's message?
Answer: I am free after noon but not Tuesday.
When a message has two key parts, a simpler replacement must keep both parts intact — not just one. Here, Sam's original message contains two facts: (1) he is available after noon, and (2) he is not available on Tuesday. Your job is to find the choice that preserves both of those ideas.
Choice B says "I am free after noon but not Tuesday." This captures the "after noon" window from the first part and the Tuesday exception from the second part. Both pieces of Sam's message survive, just in plainer language. B is the correct answer.
Choice A says "free each morning," which actually reverses Sam's availability — he said after noon, not before noon (morning). This gets the time of day completely wrong.
Choice C says "free all Tuesday after noon," which is the opposite of what Sam meant. Sam specifically said Tuesday is the day he cannot meet, but C presents Tuesday as an available day.
Choice D says "free before noon but not Tuesday." Like A, this flips the time — Sam is available after noon, not before. Getting the Tuesday part right doesn't matter if the time is wrong.
A helpful strategy: when checking simplified sentences, make a quick mental checklist of every key detail in the original — time, exceptions, conditions — and tick off each one in the answer choice. If even one detail is missing or reversed, that choice fails. On questions like this, wrong answers usually get one thing right and quietly change another, so always verify the full message, not just part of it.
- Which simple sentence gives the same meaning?
Answer: It hurts sometimes, but not always.
When a question asks you to find a sentence with the "same meaning," your job is to match the idea, not just find similar words. Think about exactly what the original phrase means before looking at the choices.
"The pain comes and goes" means the pain is not constant — it appears sometimes and disappears other times. It is not always there, but it is not never there either. With that meaning in mind, look at each option.
Choice C says "It hurts sometimes, but not always." This captures both sides perfectly: the pain does happen ("sometimes"), but it doesn't stay ("not always"). That matches "comes and goes" exactly, making C the correct answer.
Choice A says "It hurts when I walk." This describes a trigger — something that causes the pain — not a pattern of coming and going. The pain might actually be constant; this sentence just adds a condition.
Choice B says "It hurts all the time." This is the opposite of the original meaning. "Comes and goes" means the pain is not constant, but B says it never stops. This is a common trap — it sounds serious and medical, but it contradicts the passage.
Choice D says "It hurts in many places." This talks about location, not timing. "Comes and goes" says nothing about where the pain is, only about when it happens.
A useful tip: when matching meanings, identify the key idea first — here it's timing (sometimes/not always). Then eliminate any answer that changes the subject to something different, like location, triggers, or intensity.
- Which simpler question gives Nora's full meaning?
Answer: Can I pay the rent by Friday?
When someone asks for an "extension" on rent, they're asking for more time to pay — not a partial payment, a refund, or a higher amount. That's the key idea to hold onto here: Nora needs a simpler way to say "give me more time to pay the full rent, and my deadline is Friday."
Choice C — "Can I pay the rent by Friday?" — captures exactly that meaning. It tells the landlord she wants to pay the full rent, and it sets Friday as the new deadline. This is a plain, clear way to ask for an extension without using the word itself.
Choice A — "Can I pay part of the rent Friday?" — changes the meaning entirely. Nora isn't asking to split her payment; she wants more time to pay the whole amount. Choice B — "Can I get my rent back Friday?" — suggests she wants a refund, as if she already paid and wants the money returned. That's the opposite of her situation. Choice D — "Can I pay more rent on Friday?" — implies she wants to pay an extra or additional amount, which isn't what an extension means at all.
The trap in this question is that all four choices mention rent and Friday, so they can seem similar at a glance. Slow down and ask yourself: what is the person actually trying to do? Nora wants more time to pay the full amount — that's the one idea your replacement sentence must keep. When a question asks you to restate something in simpler words, always check that the core meaning stays the same.
- Which simpler sentence gives the full meaning?
Answer: Water started dripping yesterday and still drips now.
When a sentence uses the phrase "has been leaking since yesterday," pay close attention to two things: when something started and whether it's still happening now. This type of question tests whether you can find a simpler sentence that captures the full picture — both the starting point and the current situation.
The original sentence tells us the sink began leaking yesterday and is still leaking right now. That's two key facts working together. Choice C — "Water started dripping yesterday and still drips now" — captures both facts perfectly. It tells you when the dripping began (yesterday) and confirms it hasn't stopped (still drips now). That makes C the correct answer.
Choice A gets the timing right by mentioning yesterday, but it says the dripping stopped — which is the opposite of what Devin wants to say. The whole problem is that it hasn't stopped. Choice B says the dripping started again today, which changes the timeline entirely — the original sentence clearly says it began yesterday, not today. Choice D is the furthest off; it says water may drip after today, turning a current, ongoing problem into a future possibility that hasn't even happened yet.
A helpful strategy: when you see words like "has been" paired with "since," the sentence is always describing something that started in the past and is still true now. Any answer that says the problem stopped, started at a different time, or hasn't happened yet will be wrong. Train yourself to ask: When did it start? Is it still happening? Find the answer that says yes to both.
- Which simpler sentence gives the same message?
Answer: The copy machine does not work.
When a word or phrase slips your mind, the best move is to think about what it means and find simpler words that say the same thing. That's exactly the skill this question tests — replacing an unfamiliar phrase with plain, everyday language.
"Out of order" means that something is broken or not functioning. So the replacement sentence needs to carry that same core message. Choice B, "The copy machine does not work," does exactly that. "Does not work" is a simple, direct way to say the machine is broken — same meaning, easier words.
The other choices each describe something different from broken. Choice A says the machine "is not here," meaning it's missing or has been removed — but Luis can see the machine; it's just not working. Choice C says the machine "has no paper," which is a specific supply problem — the machine might work fine otherwise, just needing a refill. That's not the same as being broken. Choice D says the machine "is being used," meaning someone is currently using it — but "out of order" doesn't mean occupied, it means non-functional.
Notice how A, C, and D each describe a real problem a copy machine could have, which makes them tempting. This is a common trap: wrong answers that sound related to the topic but change the actual meaning.
Your strategy: when replacing a phrase, ask yourself, "Does this new sentence mean the exact same thing?" If the new sentence describes something even slightly different, it's wrong — even if the topic is the same.
- Which simpler sentence gives the same message?
Answer: I need to take money out of my account.
When a question asks you to replace a word you don't know with a simpler phrase, your job is to find the sentence that keeps the exact same meaning — nothing added, nothing changed, just easier words.
The key word here is "withdraw." At a bank, withdrawing money means taking money out of your account. That's the core action Kim wants to describe. Choice D — "I need to take money out of my account" — captures that meaning perfectly using everyday words most people already know. "Take out" is simply a plain-language way of saying "withdraw," and the rest of the sentence stays the same.
Now look at why the other choices fall short. Choice A says "put money *in*" my account — that's the opposite action, called a deposit. Mixing up deposits and withdrawals is a common real-life mistake, so watch for it. Choice B says "send money to an account," which describes a transfer to someone else's account, a completely different banking action. Choice C says "count money," which isn't a banking transaction at all — counting doesn't move any money anywhere.
A helpful tip: when replacing an unfamiliar word, ask yourself, "Does this new sentence make the same thing happen?" With money, the two basic directions are in (deposit) and out (withdraw). If Kim wants to withdraw, she wants money moving out — so any answer describing money going in, staying put, or moving to another account is automatically wrong. Answer D is the only choice where the money moves in the right direction.
