ACCUPLACER ESL - Reading Skills • Words & Phrases

Reference Words & Antecedents — Recognize reference words (pronouns) and what they refer to

Master the skill of tracking pronouns back to their antecedents for stronger reading comprehension.

English reading illustration with an open book and text analysis symbols
Inside this lesson 10 sections 5 questions 5 figures

SECTION 1

Historical Context & Motivation

The study of how words refer back to previously mentioned nouns — a process linguists call anaphora — has fascinated grammarians and language scholars for centuries. Ancient Greek and Latin rhetoricians noticed that speakers routinely substituted short words like "he," "she," or "it" for longer noun phrases already established in a discourse. Without this substitution mechanism, language would be unbearably repetitive: every sentence would require the full re-statement of each noun. Understanding how reference words connect to their antecedents is essential not only for reading comprehension but also for clear academic writing, standardized test performance, and everyday communication in English.

~100 BCE • Classical Rhetoric

Greek and Roman grammarians such as Dionysius Thrax categorized pronouns as a distinct part of speech, noting that they 'stand in place of' nouns to avoid repetition in oratory and written texts.

1762 • Robert Lowth's Grammar

Bishop Robert Lowth published A Short Introduction to English Grammar, formalizing the rule that every pronoun must have a clear antecedent — a prescriptive principle still taught today.

1960s • Chomsky & Binding Theory

Noam Chomsky's generative grammar introduced formal constraints on pronoun-antecedent relationships, showing that syntactic structure governs which noun a pronoun can legally refer to.

1980s • Discourse Analysis & Cohesion

Halliday and Hasan's work on textual cohesion demonstrated that reference words are a primary tool for linking sentences together, creating smooth, coherent passages that readers can follow without confusion.

Present • Standardized Testing

Exams like the ACCUPLACER ESL routinely test pronoun-antecedent recognition because the skill directly measures a student's ability to track meaning across sentences and paragraphs.

The central question this lesson addresses is straightforward yet frequently challenging for multilingual learners: when you encounter a pronoun in a reading passage, how do you reliably determine which noun it replaces? Mastering this skill will allow you to decode complex academic passages, answer ACCUPLACER reference-word questions with confidence, and produce writing that is clear and cohesive.

SECTION 2

Core Principles & Definitions

Before practicing with passages, you need a solid grasp of the foundational terminology and principles that govern reference words. A reference word (most commonly a pronoun) is any word that points back — or occasionally forward — to another word or phrase in the text. The word or phrase being pointed to is the antecedent (from the Latin ante, meaning 'before,' and cedere, meaning 'to go'). Together, the pronoun and its antecedent form a referential chain — the invisible thread that keeps a reader tracking meaning across sentences and paragraphs.

1

Agreement in Number

A pronoun must match its antecedent in number. Singular nouns pair with singular pronouns (he, she, it); plural nouns pair with plural pronouns (they, them, their).
2

Agreement in Gender

In English, third-person singular pronouns carry gender information. He/him refers to masculine antecedents, she/her to feminine, and it/its to non-human or inanimate antecedents.
3

Proximity Principle

A pronoun typically refers to the nearest preceding noun that matches it in number and gender. When multiple candidate nouns exist, the closest plausible match is usually the intended antecedent.
4

Semantic Logic

Grammar alone does not always resolve ambiguity. Readers must also consider meaning: the pronoun should refer to the noun that makes logical and contextual sense within the passage.
5

Types of Reference Words

Beyond personal pronouns, reference words include demonstratives (this, that, these, those), relative pronouns (which, who, that), and indefinite reference words like one, some, such.
✦

KEY TAKEAWAY

Think of a pronoun as a hyperlink in a web page. When you click a hyperlink, it takes you to the source page it references. When you encounter a pronoun, you must mentally 'click' it to trace it back to the original noun — its antecedent. If the link is broken (ambiguous or missing antecedent), the reader gets a '404 error' in comprehension.

SECTION 3

Visual Explanation — The Referential Chain

Pronoun → Antecedent Referential ChainSentence:"Dr. Amara published a groundbreaking study. She presented it at the conference."Dr. AmaraANTECEDENT 1(singular, feminine, human)a groundbreaking studyANTECEDENT 2(singular, neuter, non-human)ShePRONOUN(singular, feminine)itPRONOUN(singular, neuter)Matching Rules AppliedShe → Dr. Amara(gender + number match)it → study(number + animacy match)
This diagram illustrates how two pronouns in the second sentence — She and it — trace back to their respective antecedents in the first sentence using agreement in gender, number, and animacy.

As the diagram shows, the process of identifying an antecedent involves two simultaneous checks. First, you apply grammatical agreement — does the pronoun match a candidate noun in number (singular vs. plural) and gender (masculine, feminine, or neuter)? Second, you apply semantic logic — does the sentence still make sense when you mentally substitute the candidate noun back in for the pronoun? In the example above, "She" could not logically refer to "study" because a study cannot present something at a conference; only a person can. This dual check — grammar plus meaning — is the engine that drives accurate pronoun resolution in reading.

SECTION 4

How Pronoun Resolution Works — A Step-by-Step Mechanism

Although reference-word identification is not governed by mathematical formulas, it follows a systematic procedure that you can apply every time you encounter a pronoun in a reading passage. Think of this procedure as a decision algorithm that narrows down multiple candidate nouns to the single correct antecedent. The mechanism relies on three filters applied in sequence: grammatical agreement, proximity, and contextual plausibility.

The Three-Filter Process

Three-Filter Pronoun Resolution FlowchartEncounter a PronounFILTER 1: Grammatical AgreementEliminate nouns that disagree in number, gender,or person with the pronoun.FILTER 2: ProximityAmong remaining candidates, favor the noun closestto the pronoun (usually in the same or preceding sentence).FILTER 3: Contextual PlausibilitySubstitute the remaining candidate back into the sentence.Does the meaning make logical sense?✓ Antecedent Identified
The three-filter flowchart represents the decision process a reader should follow whenever encountering a pronoun whose referent is unclear. Apply grammatical agreement first, then proximity, and finally contextual plausibility to confirm your answer.

Consider the sentence: "The manager told the employee that he would receive a promotion." Both "manager" and "employee" are singular and masculine, so Filter 1 does not eliminate either candidate. Filter 2 (proximity) suggests "employee" because it is the nearer noun. Filter 3 (contextual plausibility) then confirms: it is the employee who would logically receive a promotion from a manager. In cases where proximity and meaning align, identification is swift; when they conflict, meaning overrides proximity. The ACCUPLACER ESL exam frequently constructs questions that test exactly this kind of reasoning.

💡

Test-Day Tip

When an ACCUPLACER question asks "In the passage, the word 'they' refers to…," mentally replace the pronoun with each answer choice. The choice that makes the sentence grammatically correct and logically coherent is the correct antecedent.

SECTION 5

Detailed Classification of Reference Words

Reference words extend far beyond the familiar personal pronouns. The ACCUPLACER ESL exam may test any category of reference word, so a thorough understanding of each type is essential. Below is a comprehensive classification with examples illustrating how each type connects to its antecedent.

CategoryExamplesSample SentenceAntecedent Identification
Personal Pronouns (Subject)he, she, it, they, we"Maria studied all night. She passed the exam."She → Maria (singular, feminine)
Personal Pronouns (Object)him, her, it, them, us"The students struggled, but the tutor helped them."them → students (plural)
Possessive Determinershis, her, its, their, our"The company announced its quarterly earnings."its → company (singular, neuter)
Demonstrativesthis, that, these, those"Researchers found new species. This discovery shocked the world."This discovery → found new species (entire clause)
Relative Pronounswho, whom, which, that"The policy, which was enacted last year, reduced costs."which → policy (nearest noun before comma)
Reflexive Pronounshimself, herself, itself, themselves"The CEO addressed the criticism herself."herself → CEO (same-clause subject)

Classification of reference words commonly tested on the ACCUPLACER ESL

⚠

Watch Out: Demonstratives Referring to Clauses

Demonstrative pronouns like this and that can refer to an entire idea or clause, not just a single noun. For example, in "Inflation rose sharply. That worried economists," the word "that" refers to the entire preceding event — the sharp rise in inflation — rather than to any one noun.

SECTION 6

Worked Example — ACCUPLACER-Style Passage

Below is a passage similar to what you would encounter on the ACCUPLACER ESL Reading Skills test, followed by a step-by-step demonstration of how to identify the antecedent of a specific reference word.

📝

Passage

"Solar panels convert sunlight into electricity, making them an increasingly popular option for homeowners who want to reduce their energy costs. Although the initial installation can be expensive, many governments offer subsidies that offset it. Experts predict this trend will continue as technology improves."

Question: In the passage, the word "it" in the second sentence refers to —

  • (A) sunlight
  • (B) electricity
  • (C) the initial installation cost
  • (D) subsidies

Step-by-Step Resolution

  1. 1

    Step 1 — Locate the Pronoun and Its Sentence

    Find the pronoun "it" in context: "…governments offer subsidies that offset it." The pronoun is singular and neuter, functioning as the direct object of the verb "offset."
    Pronoun identified: it (singular, neuter, object position)
  2. 2

    Step 2 — Apply Filter 1: Grammatical Agreement

    Scan for singular, neuter noun candidates. "Sunlight" (singular, neuter) — possible. "Electricity" (singular, neuter) — possible. "The initial installation" (singular, neuter, referring to the cost) — possible. "Subsidies" is plural, so it is eliminated immediately.
    Eliminated: (D) subsidies — plural mismatch
  3. 3

    Step 3 — Apply Filter 2: Proximity

    Among the remaining candidates — sunlight, electricity, and the initial installation cost — "the initial installation" appears in the same sentence as "it" and is the nearest matching noun. "Sunlight" and "electricity" appear in the preceding sentence, farther away.
    Strongest proximity match: (C) the initial installation cost
  4. 4

    Step 4 — Apply Filter 3: Contextual Plausibility

    Substitute each remaining candidate: "Subsidies that offset sunlight" — illogical; you do not offset sunlight. "Subsidies that offset electricity" — unclear and illogical. "Subsidies that offset the initial installation cost" — perfectly logical; subsidies reduce costs. The meaning confirms our proximity-based choice.
    Confirmed answer: (C) the initial installation cost
✦

KEY TAKEAWAY

Notice how the three filters work in sequence like a funnel: grammatical agreement casts a wide net, proximity narrows the field, and contextual plausibility seals the deal. On the ACCUPLACER, incorrect answer choices are typically designed to survive one or two of these filters but fail the third, so always apply all three.

SECTION 7

Common Pitfalls & How to Avoid Them

Even advanced learners fall into predictable traps when identifying antecedents. The table below contrasts frequent mistakes with the correct reasoning, and the takeaway that follows offers a strategy for avoiding each one.

PitfallWhy It HappensHow to Avoid It
Choosing the nearest noun without checking agreementReaders rely on proximity alone and skip the grammatical filter, selecting a close noun that mismatches in number or gender.Always check number and gender before applying proximity.
Ignoring clause-level antecedentsWhen "this" or "that" refers to an entire idea rather than a single noun, readers search fruitlessly for a single-word antecedent.Ask: does the pronoun refer to a thing or to a situation/event? If the latter, look for the entire clause.
Confusing 'which' with 'that' antecedentsNon-restrictive 'which' always refers to the noun immediately before the comma, but readers sometimes skip to a more distant noun.For non-restrictive 'which,' look at the noun directly preceding the comma-which construction.
Selecting a noun from the wrong sentenceIn multi-sentence passages, a matching noun from a distant sentence may seem plausible but is not the writer's intended referent.Start your search in the same sentence as the pronoun, then move to the immediately preceding sentence if needed.

Common antecedent-identification pitfalls and solutions

🛡️

STRATEGY SUMMARY

Think of antecedent identification as a GPS navigation system: the grammatical agreement filter is your map, proximity is your compass pointing to the nearest route, and contextual plausibility is the real-time traffic check that confirms you are heading the right way. If you skip any one of these steps, you risk taking a wrong turn.

SECTION 8

Connection to Advanced Reading Comprehension

Pronoun-antecedent recognition is not merely a grammar exercise; it is a foundational skill that connects directly to more advanced reading competencies. On the ACCUPLACER and in academic contexts, the ability to track referential chains supports inference, author's-purpose analysis, and synthesis of information across paragraphs. Understanding how reference words function at a basic level prepares you for the more demanding cohesion-analysis tasks encountered in advanced coursework and professional communication.

Basic Skill (This Lesson)Advanced Application
Identifying a pronoun's antecedent in a single sentenceTracking multiple referential chains across a multi-paragraph academic article
Recognizing personal pronouns (he, she, they)Interpreting abstract demonstratives (this, such) that refer to entire arguments or theories
Using substitution to verify the correct antecedentEvaluating whether an author's use of ambiguous reference creates intentional rhetorical effects
Applying number and gender agreement rulesAnalyzing how languages with different pronoun systems (e.g., Japanese zero pronouns) handle reference differently

From basic pronoun recognition to advanced discourse analysis

As you advance in your studies, you will encounter texts in which a single pronoun like "it" or "this" may refer to an idea developed over several sentences. At that level, the three-filter approach from this lesson still applies, but the scope of your search expands. Building automaticity with the techniques covered here will make those higher-order tasks significantly more manageable. In academic writing courses, you will also learn to produce clear antecedent relationships in your own essays, ensuring that every pronoun you write has an unambiguous referent — a skill that directly improves the coherence and persuasiveness of your prose.

SECTION 9

Practice Problems

Question 1: CONCEPTUAL

Define the terms reference word and antecedent. Then explain why the three-filter approach (grammatical agreement, proximity, contextual plausibility) is more reliable than using any single filter alone.
Show answer
A reference word — most commonly a pronoun — is a word that stands in for another word or phrase in a text. An antecedent is the specific word or phrase that the reference word replaces. The three-filter approach is more reliable because each filter addresses a different dimension of the pronoun–antecedent relationship. Grammatical agreement eliminates candidates that mismatch in number, gender, or person. Proximity helps when multiple candidates pass the agreement check by favoring the nearest one. Contextual plausibility serves as the final confirmation, ensuring that the substitution makes logical sense. Relying on only one filter can lead to errors — for instance, proximity alone might select the nearest noun even if it disagrees in number.

Question 2: BASIC

Read the following sentence and identify the antecedent of the underlined pronoun: "The professor assigned a research paper, and the students completed it by Friday." (A) the professor (B) the students (C) a research paper (D) Friday
Show answer
The correct answer is (C) a research paper. The pronoun "it" is singular and neuter. "The professor" is singular but human (and would typically require "him" or "her"), so it is less likely. "The students" is plural, which mismatches singular "it." "Friday" is a proper noun functioning as a time expression and is not something one can 'complete.' A research paper is the only singular, neuter noun that can logically be completed, and substitution confirms: 'the students completed the research paper by Friday.'

Question 3: INTERMEDIATE

Read the passage and answer the question: "Urban gardens provide fresh produce and create green spaces. They also strengthen community bonds because neighbors must cooperate to maintain them. City planners recognize this and have allocated more funding." The word "this" in the third sentence refers to — (A) fresh produce (B) green spaces (C) the fact that urban gardens strengthen community bonds through cooperation (D) city planners
Show answer
The correct answer is (C). "This" is a demonstrative pronoun that, in this context, refers not to a single noun but to the broader idea expressed in the preceding sentence — namely, that urban gardens strengthen community bonds because neighbors must cooperate. Choice (A) and (B) are specific nouns from the first sentence and are too distant and narrow to serve as the referent. Choice (D) is the subject of the sentence containing "this" and therefore cannot be what "this" refers back to. The substitution test confirms: 'City planners recognize [the fact that urban gardens strengthen community bonds through cooperation] and have allocated more funding.' This makes logical sense.

Question 4: APPLIED

Read the passage and identify the antecedent of each underlined reference word: "Dr. Patel and Dr. Kim co-authored a study on marine biology. (1)They submitted (2)it to a prestigious journal, (3)which published the findings last month. The media coverage (4)that followed increased public interest in ocean conservation."
Show answer
(1) "They" → Dr. Patel and Dr. Kim. The pronoun is plural and refers to the two researchers who are the subject of the preceding clause. (2) "it" → a study on marine biology. The pronoun is singular and neuter; it is the thing being submitted. (3) "which" → a prestigious journal. This is a non-restrictive relative pronoun referring to the noun directly before it — the journal is what published the findings. (4) "that" → the media coverage. Here "that" is a restrictive relative pronoun modifying "media coverage," specifying which coverage is meant — the coverage that followed (the publication). Each identification was confirmed by substituting the candidate noun back into the sentence to verify logical coherence.

Question 5: CRITICAL THINKING

Consider the following deliberately ambiguous sentence: "When the director met the actor, he was nervous." Explain why this sentence is ambiguous with respect to the pronoun "he." Then rewrite the sentence in two different ways — one that clearly makes the director the antecedent and one that clearly makes the actor the antecedent — and explain what linguistic strategy you used to resolve the ambiguity in each version.
Show answer
The sentence is ambiguous because both "the director" and "the actor" are singular, masculine nouns, meaning grammatical agreement (Filter 1) cannot distinguish between them. Proximity (Filter 2) slightly favors "the actor" as the nearer noun, but the context offers no additional clues to confirm or override this reading. Contextual plausibility (Filter 3) is neutral — either person could logically be nervous. Version 1 (director is nervous): "When the director met the actor, the director was nervous." This uses noun repetition to eliminate the pronoun entirely. Version 2 (actor is nervous): "When the director met the actor, the actor appeared nervous." Again, explicit noun repetition resolves the ambiguity. An alternative strategy is restructuring: "Nervous about the meeting, the director greeted the actor" (participial phrase attached to the intended subject) or "The actor felt nervous when the director met him" (changing sentence structure so the pronoun 'him' clearly contrasts with the subject 'the actor'). These strategies — noun repetition, restructuring, and strategic pronoun placement — are the primary tools writers use to eliminate pronoun-antecedent ambiguity.

SUMMARY

Lesson Summary

Summary

Reference words — primarily pronouns such as he, she, it, they, this, that, and which — serve as linguistic shortcuts that point back to previously mentioned nouns or ideas called antecedents. To identify the correct antecedent on the ACCUPLACER ESL, apply a three-filter strategy: first check grammatical agreement (number, gender, person), then consider proximity (the closest matching noun), and finally verify contextual plausibility by substituting the candidate back into the sentence to confirm that the meaning is logically sound.

Remember that reference words extend beyond simple personal pronouns to include demonstratives (this, that, these, those), relative pronouns (which, who, that), possessive determiners (his, her, its, their), and reflexive pronouns (himself, herself, themselves). Demonstratives deserve special attention because they frequently refer to entire clauses or ideas rather than single nouns. Mastering pronoun-antecedent recognition strengthens not only your test performance but also your broader reading comprehension and academic writing, enabling you to track meaning across complex texts and produce clear, cohesive prose.

Varsity Tutors • ACCUPLACER ESL - Reading Skills • Reference Words & Antecedents