- How does word choice convey the author's point of view?
Answer: Words like alarming show a concerned point of view about app privacy.
The word "alarming" carries a strong worried feeling, so it signals a concerned point of view about apps tracking your location. The advice to check privacy settings often supports that worry, which is why the concerned reading is the best answer. A neutral point of view that just reports facts does not fit, because "alarming" is a feeling word, not a plain fact. An approving point of view that trusts app privacy is wrong, since "alarming" is negative and the author is warning users, not praising the apps. An amused point of view that jokes about privacy also fails, because "alarming" is serious language meant to caution readers, not to make them laugh. Only the concerned reading matches the emotion that "alarming" actually creates.
- What is the author's point of view, and how is it conveyed?
Answer: Supportive, shown by praising the change and urging the school to keep options like this.
The writer calls the salad bar a "smart" change, points to its fresh choices, and says the school should keep improving options like this. That positive language plus the push to continue shows a supportive point of view, so the choice naming praise and urging the school to keep the change is correct. The critical choice claims the writer warns against the bar and wants it dropped, but the passage never criticizes it. The neutral choice claims the writer only describes and stays undecided, yet "smart" is a clear opinion word. The uncertain choice claims the writer questions and doubts the change, but the tone is confident and approving throughout. Only one option matches both the writer's positive attitude and the way words and a suggestion reveal it.
- What is the author's point of view, and what evidence conveys it?
Answer: Critical of the school system, shown by negative word choice and problem-focused details.
The author uses negative words like "outdated" and lists problems (crowded rooms, too little help) and demands "real changes," which shows a critical point of view. Choice C names that view and its evidence, so it is correct. Choice A (supportive) and Choice D (hopeful) misread the tone, and Choice B (neutral) ignores the clear complaints, so none fits.
- What is the author's point of view about the schools, and how is it conveyed?
Answer: The author is disapproving of the schools, using negative words like "fail" and "outdated" to show they fall short.
The author's word choices carry a clear negative charge. Calling the improvements "so-called," saying schools "fail" students, and describing textbooks as "outdated" all show disapproval, so the choice that names a disapproving view and points to those negative words is correct. The supportive choice claims the author praises progress with upbeat words, but nothing in the passage praises the schools. The hopeful choice claims cheerful words suggest changes are working, yet "so-called improvements" mocks that idea rather than celebrating it. The neutral choice says the author avoids loaded words, but "fail" and "outdated" are exactly that—loaded, judging language. Only one option matches both the author's negative attitude and the negative words that reveal it.
- What evidence best shows the author's point of view?
Answer: The author calls gaming a valuable hobby and lists benefits like problem-solving and teamwork.
The author's point of view is that gaming can be worthwhile, shown by calling it a "valuable hobby" and naming benefits like problem-solving and teamwork. Choice B points to that evidence, so it is correct. Choice A says there are only definitions (there are examples), Choice C says there are numbers and dates (there are none), and Choice D says there is a joke (there is none), so none reflects the actual text.
- What is the author's purpose, and what evidence conveys it?
Answer: To inform about tsunamis, shown through definitions and factual details in a neutral tone.
The paragraph defines what a tsunami is and lists plain facts about how the waves form and behave, all in a calm, neutral tone. That matches a purpose to inform, backed by definitions and factual details. The choice about persuading readers to leave the coast is wrong because the passage gives no emotional appeals or commands telling readers to do anything. The choice about warning of a specific coming disaster is wrong because the passage never names a date, place, or actual approaching event—it only explains how tsunamis work in general. The choice about describing one person's frightening experience is wrong because there is no story, no named person, and no personal feelings—just general information. Only the informing choice names both a purpose and the evidence that actually appears in the text.
- Read this public message: "Mosquitoes can spread diseases like West Nile virus. Dump standing water in buckets and flowerpots, and use screens on windows. These simple steps protect your family and neighbors." What is the author's purpose, and how is it conveyed?
Answer: To persuade people to take safety actions, conveyed through advice and direct instructions
The message wants readers to do something. It names a problem (mosquitoes spread disease) and then gives commands—"Dump standing water" and "use screens"—along with the appeal that these steps "protect your family and neighbors." That combination of direct instructions and a call to action shows the purpose is to persuade people to take safety actions.
The choice about entertaining with a dramatic tale is wrong because the passage has no characters, plot, or twist ending—it gives real safety advice, not a story. The choice about informing readers on mosquito biology is wrong because the text never describes body parts or habits; it focuses on what readers should do, not on facts about the insect. The choice about explaining how mosquitoes fly is wrong for the same reason: there are no descriptions of wing movement or speed, only instructions for preventing disease. Only the persuasive answer matches the commands and the appeal to protect family and neighbors.
- Read the passage: "A hurricane is a large storm that forms over warm ocean water. It brings strong winds, heavy rain, and can cause flooding." What is the author's purpose, and what tone conveys it?
Answer: To inform, using an objective tone that presents clear facts about how hurricanes form and what they do.
The passage simply tells you what a hurricane is and what it does, using calm, neutral words like "is," "forms," "brings," and "can cause." There is no opinion, no emotion, and no advice—just facts presented in an objective tone. That matches the choice about informing with clear facts. The choice about persuading with an urgent tone is wrong because the author never argues that readers should do anything, like prepare their homes; there are no words like "should" or "must." The choice about entertaining with suspense is wrong because the passage is not a story—it has no characters, plot, or dramatic build-up, only a definition and a list of effects. The choice about explaining with step-by-step safety directions is wrong because the author describes what a hurricane is, not how to do something; there are no steps or instructions for staying safe. Remember, informative writing can cover serious topics like storms while staying factual and calm, so don't assume a scary subject means the author is trying to persuade or entertain you.
- What is the author's purpose, and how is it conveyed?
Answer: To persuade, because it gives reasons and uses "should" to suggest a fix.
The author lists benefits of recycling and then says the town "should" add more bins. That word "should" is a call to action, so the author is trying to persuade readers. The choice naming persuade and pointing to the reasons plus the word "should" is correct. The choice saying inform is wrong because the author does not just report facts—the ending pushes for a specific action. The choice saying entertain is wrong because the passage tells no amusing story and only presents plain facts and an opinion. The choice saying explain is wrong because the passage never gives steps for sorting materials; it argues for adding bins instead. Only one choice matches both the true purpose and how the author shows it.
- What is the author's purpose, and how is it conveyed?
Answer: To explain a process, shown through sequence words and cause-and-effect details.
The passage lays out the steps of photosynthesis in order, using time words like "first" and "then," and it shows a result with "lets out oxygen as a result." That mix of sequence and cause-and-effect signals the author's purpose: to explain a process. The choice about persuading is wrong because the paragraph gives no commands or opinions telling readers to grow plants; it only states facts. The choice about describing how a plant looks is wrong because there are no sensory details about color, shape, or size—the focus is on actions and steps, not appearance. The choice about comparing two things is wrong because the passage never sets two items side by side or uses contrast words to point out differences; it follows a single process from start to finish. Only the explaining choice matches both what the author is doing and how the writing shows it.
- What is the author's point of view, and how is it conveyed?
Answer: Neutral, shown by plain factual details and an informational tone.
The passage only reports facts: what school lunches include and why menus can change. It uses no opinion words, no praise, and no urging, so the tone is plain and informational. That is why neutral, shown by plain factual details and an informational tone, is the best answer. The supportive choice is wrong because the passage never praises the meals or calls them healthy and worthwhile—it just lists what they contain. The critical choice is wrong because there are no weaknesses pointed out and no disapproving words anywhere in the text. The persuasive choice is wrong because the author never urges readers to make any particular lunch choice; nothing tells the reader what to do. To answer, focus on the author's tone and word choice, not just the topic.
- What is the author's purpose, and how is it conveyed?
Answer: To explain, using order words that walk readers through the steps of a process.
The passage lays out the steps of photosynthesis in order and uses order words to show which step comes first and which comes next, so its job is to explain a process. The choice naming this purpose and this method is correct. The choice that says persuade is wrong because the passage has no emotional language and never urges readers to do anything. The choice that says entertain is wrong because there is no invented character, dialogue, or story here. The choice that says describe is wrong because the passage focuses on the sequence of steps, not on sensory details about how a leaf looks or feels. To find the answer, decide what the author is trying to do and then check that the method actually matches the writing.
