6th Grade Reading (Common Core) • Speaking and Listening

Evaluating a Speaker's Argument and Claims

Learn to break apart what a speaker says and figure out which claims are backed up by real evidence—and which ones aren't.

Middle School English emblem with an open book, a writing pencil, and spelling check.
Inside this lesson 10 sections 5 questions 5 figures

Section 1

Why Do We Analyze Arguments?

People have been making arguments—and trying to figure out if those arguments are any good—for thousands of years. Long before the internet, before television, and even before books were widely available, thinkers realized that not every claim a person makes is trustworthy. Some claims are backed by solid proof, while others are just opinions or guesses. Learning to tell the difference is one of the most valuable skills you can develop.

~400 B.C.E.

The ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle wrote about the art of persuasion. He taught his students to look for three things in any argument: logos (logic and evidence), ethos (the speaker's credibility), and pathos (emotional appeal).

1400s–1500s

The invention of the printing press meant more people could read arguments for themselves. Readers started asking: "Is this claim supported by facts, or is the author just making things up?"

1700s

During the Age of Enlightenment, scientists and philosophers insisted that every important claim should be tested with evidence. This way of thinking shaped modern science and government.

2000s–Today

With social media, podcasts, and 24-hour news, we hear more arguments every day than any generation before us. Being able to evaluate claims and spot unsupported ones is now an essential life skill.

So here's the big question this lesson answers: When you listen to someone making an argument, how do you figure out which parts are well supported and which parts aren't? That's exactly what we'll learn to do.

Section 2

Core Definitions You Need to Know

Before we dive in, let's make sure we're all on the same page with a few important terms. These are the building blocks of every argument you'll ever hear.

1

Argument

An argument is the speaker's main point—what they want you to believe or do. It's the big idea they're trying to convince you about. For example: "Our school should start 30 minutes later."
2

Claim

A claim is a specific statement that supports the argument. One argument can have several claims. Example: "Students who sleep more get better grades." That claim supports the argument about starting school later.
3

Reason

A reason explains why the speaker believes a claim is true. It's the "because" part. Example: "Because teen brains need 8–10 hours of sleep to work their best." A reason connects the claim to logic.
4

Evidence

Evidence is the specific proof that backs up a reason or claim—things like facts, statistics, expert quotes, or research studies. Example: "A 2014 study by the American Academy of Pediatrics found that later start times improved attendance by 15%."
✦

Key Takeaway

Think of an argument like a house. The argument is the roof—the main idea holding everything together. The claims are the walls that hold up the roof. The reasons are the beams inside those walls. And the evidence is the concrete foundation underneath it all. A house without a foundation might look okay from the outside, but it won't stand up when a storm comes. The same is true for an argument without evidence!

Section 3

Mapping an Argument: A Visual Guide

Let's see how an argument, its claims, reasons, and evidence all fit together. The diagram below shows how a well-built argument is structured—like an upside-down tree where the main argument is at the top and the supporting details branch out below.

ARGUMENTCLAIM 1CLAIM 2Reason + EvidenceReason OnlyReason + EvidenceReason Only✓ SUPPORTED(facts, data, quotes)✗ UNSUPPORTED(opinion, no proof)✓ SUPPORTED(research study)✗ UNSUPPORTED(just feelings)Supported by evidenceNot supported
Diagram showing the structure of an argument with claims, reasons, and evidence branching downward like a tree.

Notice how the argument sits at the very top. Below it, you see claims—the specific statements the speaker makes. Each claim has reasons underneath it. But here's the important part: some of those reasons are backed up by solid evidence (like research, facts, or expert opinions), while others are not supported. Your job as a listener is to figure out which is which!

Section 4

How to Delineate (Break Down) a Speaker's Argument

The word delineate (dee-LIN-ee-ate) means to describe or outline something carefully and clearly. When you delineate a speaker's argument, you're breaking it apart piece by piece so you can understand it—and judge it. Here's a step-by-step process you can use every time you listen to someone make an argument.

The 4-Step Evaluation Process

FindtheArgument→IdentifyClaims→CheckforReasons→LookforEvidenceFind the Argument → Identify Claims → Check for Reasons → Look for Evidence

Follow these steps in order each time you hear a speech, presentation, or debate.

Step 1: Find the Argument

Ask yourself: "What is this speaker trying to convince me of?" The argument is the big-picture idea. Sometimes a speaker states it directly at the beginning. Other times, you have to figure it out by listening to everything they say.

Step 2: Identify the Claims

Once you know the main argument, listen for the specific claims. Each claim is a smaller statement that supports the big idea. A good way to spot claims is to listen for confident statements—things the speaker says as if they're facts. Write them down if you can!

Step 3: Check for Reasons

For each claim, ask: "Did the speaker explain why this is true?" A reason connects the claim to logic. If a speaker says "We should have longer recess," that's a claim. If they add "because physical activity helps kids focus," now you have a reason.

Step 4: Look for Evidence

This is the most important step. For each reason, ask: "Did the speaker give me proof?" Evidence includes facts, statistics, research studies, expert quotes, or real-world examples. If the speaker just says "Everyone knows this is true" or "I feel like this is right," that is NOT evidence. That's an unsupported claim.

✦

Key Takeaway

Imagine you're a detective solving a mystery. The speaker's argument is the case you're investigating. The claims are the clues. The reasons are the stories witnesses tell you. But the evidence is the fingerprints, the security camera footage, the DNA test. Without evidence, you don't have proof—you only have a theory. A smart detective (and a smart listener!) always asks: "Where's the proof?"

Section 5

Supported vs. Unsupported Claims

Now let's get specific about how to tell the difference between a claim that's well-supported and one that isn't. This is where you become a critical listener—someone who doesn't just accept everything they hear, but actually thinks about it.

✓ SUPPORTED CLAIMClaim: "Recycling reduces landfill waste."REASON:"Because recycling diverts materialsthat would otherwise go to landfills."EVIDENCE:"According to the EPA, Americansrecycled 69 million tons in 2018,keeping it out of landfills."WHY IT'S STRONG:• Cites a specific source (EPA)• Includes a number (69 million tons)Other evidence types:📊 Statistics & data🔬 Research studies👩‍🔬 Expert opinions or quotes📰 Documented examples📖 Historical facts✗ UNSUPPORTED CLAIMClaim: "Recycling is a waste of time."REASON:"Because nobody I know actuallyrecycles, so it doesn't matter."EVIDENCE:(None provided—just personalexperience and opinion)WHY IT'S WEAK:• No data or facts given• Based on one person's experience• Uses "nobody I know" (anecdote)Watch out for:🚩 "Everyone knows that…"🚩 "I just feel like…"🚩 "Trust me…"🚩 "Obviously…" (with no proof)🚩 "My friend told me that…"
Side-by-side comparison showing the difference between supported and unsupported claims with examples.

The two sides of this diagram show you exactly what to look for. A supported claim has a clear chain: claim → reason → evidence from a reliable source. An unsupported claim might have a reason, but it lacks real evidence. Keep your eyes and ears open for those red-flag phrases on the right side—they're clues that a speaker hasn't backed up their claim.

Claim Support Spectrum

Completely Unsupported (opinion only) Fully Supported (reason + strong evidence)

Notice that support isn't just "yes or no." It's more like a scale. Some claims fall in the middle—they have a reason but only weak evidence. As a critical listener, your goal is to figure out where each claim falls on this spectrum.

Section 6

Worked Example: Analyzing a Speech

Let's practice with a real example. Imagine a student named Maya gives the following speech at a school assembly. Read it carefully, and then we'll break it down together.

📝
"I believe our school cafeteria should offer more vegetarian options. First, eating more vegetables is healthier for growing kids. A report from the Centers for Disease Control says that only 1 in 10 kids eats enough vegetables each day. Second, vegetarian meals are better for the environment. Third, lots of students actually want more veggie options—I asked five of my friends, and they all agreed with me."

Analyzing Maya's Speech

  1. 1

    Step 1 — Find the Argument

    Maya's main argument is: "Our school cafeteria should offer more vegetarian options." This is the big idea she wants us to agree with.
  2. 2

    Step 2 — Identify the Claims

    Maya makes three specific claims to support her argument:
    Claim 1: "Eating more vegetables is healthier for growing kids." Claim 2: "Vegetarian meals are better for the environment." Claim 3: "Lots of students actually want more veggie options."
  3. 3

    Step 3 — Check for Reasons

    Claim 1 has a built-in reason: vegetables are healthy for kids because they need more of them. Claim 2 has a reason (it's "better for the environment"), but Maya doesn't explain how or why. Claim 3 also has a reason: Maya says her friends agree.
  4. 4

    Step 4 — Look for Evidence

    Claim 1: SUPPORTED ✓ — Maya cites a report from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), a well-known and respected source. She also gives a specific statistic: only 1 in 10 kids eats enough vegetables. This is strong evidence.
    Claim 2: NOT SUPPORTED ✗ — Maya says vegetarian meals help the environment, but she doesn't give any evidence at all. No study, no data, no expert quote. This claim is unsupported. Claim 3: WEAKLY SUPPORTED ⚠ — Maya says she asked five friends. That's a tiny sample—only five people! This is a personal anecdote (a story from her own experience), not real research. She'd need a school-wide survey to make this claim convincing.
  5. 5

    Final Step — Summarize Your Evaluation

    Maya's argument has some strong parts and some weak parts. Claim 1 is well-supported with a credible source and a statistic. Claim 2 needs evidence to be convincing. Claim 3 has some evidence, but it's too weak to prove that "lots" of students want change. Overall, Maya's argument would be stronger if she added evidence for Claims 2 and 3.

Section 7

What Makes Evidence Strong or Weak?

Not all evidence is created equal. Some types of evidence are very convincing, while others aren't worth much at all. Let's look at the differences so you can judge for yourself.

Type of EvidenceExampleStrength
Research study"A Harvard study found that…"Very strong — tested and reviewed by experts
Statistics / data"73% of students surveyed said…"Strong — numbers are specific and verifiable
Expert opinion"Dr. Smith, a nutrition scientist, says…"Strong — the person has training in the topic
Real-world example"When Lincoln Middle School tried this, attendance went up."Moderate — one example doesn't prove a pattern
Personal anecdote"My cousin tried it and it worked for her."Weak — one person's story isn't proof for everyone
Personal opinion / feeling"I just think it's the right thing to do."Not evidence at all — no facts or proof

As you can see, the strongest evidence comes from research and data because those are tested and can be checked by other people. Personal stories and opinions are at the bottom because they only reflect one person's experience—they don't prove anything for the whole group.

✦

Key Takeaway

Think about evidence like a chain holding up a swing. A thick steel chain (research and data) can hold a lot of weight—it's strong and reliable. A regular rope (a real-world example) might work, but it could snap under pressure. And a piece of thread (personal opinion) will break right away. When you're evaluating a speaker's claims, ask yourself: "Is this chain strong enough to hold up the argument?"

Section 8

Where This Skill Takes You Next

The skill you're learning right now—breaking down arguments and checking for evidence—is the foundation of something called critical thinking. As you move through middle school and into high school, you'll use this skill in bigger and more complex ways.

What You're Learning Now (6th Grade)Where It Goes Next (7th–12th Grade & Beyond)
Identifying a speaker's argument and claimsAnalyzing arguments in published essays, political speeches, and scientific papers
Distinguishing supported vs. unsupported claimsEvaluating the quality of evidence: Is the source biased? Is the sample size big enough?
Recognizing reasons and evidenceIdentifying logical fallacies—tricks in reasoning that seem convincing but are actually flawed
Listening critically to a single speakerComparing multiple arguments on the same topic to form your own informed opinion
Breaking down arguments verballyWriting your own evidence-based arguments in research papers and debates

Here's some exciting news: the critical listening skills you build now will help you in every subject—not just English. In science, you'll evaluate whether an experiment's results support a hypothesis. In social studies, you'll decide if a historical interpretation is backed by primary sources. And in everyday life, you'll be able to tell when an advertisement, a news story, or even a friend is making a claim without evidence. That's a powerful ability to have.

Section 9

Practice Problems

Now it's your turn! Try these five problems. For each one, think carefully before clicking "Show Answer." Remember the four steps: find the argument, identify the claims, check for reasons, and look for evidence.

Question 1: Problem 1 — Conceptual

What is the difference between a claim and evidence?
Show answer
A claim is a statement that a speaker believes to be true—it's what they're trying to convince you of. Evidence is the proof that backs up that claim, like facts, statistics, expert quotes, or research results. Think of it this way: a claim says "This is true," and evidence says "Here's why I can prove it." A claim without evidence is just an opinion. Nice work if you got this—you understand the building blocks of arguments!

Question 2: Problem 2 — Identification

Read the following statement: "Dogs make the best pets. A study by the American Veterinary Association found that dog owners exercise 30 minutes more per day than non-dog owners." Identify the claim and the evidence in this statement. Is the claim supported?
Show answer
The claim is "Dogs make the best pets." The evidence is the study from the American Veterinary Association showing that dog owners exercise 30 minutes more per day. The claim is partially supported. The evidence does show a health benefit of owning dogs, but saying dogs are the "best" pets is a broad statement. The evidence only covers exercise—it doesn't address other reasons a pet might be "the best" (like companionship, cost, or allergies). Still, having a specific study with a statistic is much better than no evidence at all!

Question 3: Problem 3 — Intermediate

A speaker says: "Our town should build a new community pool. Swimming is great exercise—everyone knows that. Plus, the town of Riverside built a pool last year, and their residents love it. Also, 82% of families in our town said they would use a community pool, according to a survey by the Parks Department." This speaker makes three claims. Which ones are supported by evidence, and which ones are not?
Show answer
Let's break this down claim by claim: Claim 1: "Swimming is great exercise" — NOT SUPPORTED. The speaker says "everyone knows that" instead of giving proof. That phrase is a red flag! They could have cited a health study or statistic to make it stronger. Claim 2: "Riverside built a pool and their residents love it" — WEAKLY SUPPORTED. This is a real-world example, which is helpful, but "love it" is vague. How do we know they love it? A survey or specific data from Riverside would be stronger. Claim 3: "82% of families would use a community pool" — WELL SUPPORTED. The speaker cites a specific percentage (82%) from a named source (Parks Department survey). This is strong evidence because it's specific, measurable, and comes from a real source. Great job analyzing if you spotted all three!

Question 4: Problem 4 — Applied

Imagine your friend says: "You should try out for the basketball team. You're really tall, and tall people are always good at basketball. My older brother is tall and he's the best player on his team. Come on, it'll be fun!" Your friend is making an argument. What is the argument? What claims do they make? Are any of those claims supported by strong evidence? Explain your thinking.
Show answer
Your friend's argument is: "You should try out for the basketball team." They make these claims: (1) You're tall, (2) tall people are always good at basketball, (3) their brother is tall and a great player, and (4) it will be fun. Let's evaluate each one. Claim 1 might be a simple fact about you. Claim 2 is unsupported and uses the word "always," which is an exaggeration. Being tall can help in basketball, but it doesn't guarantee you'll be good—skill, practice, and coordination matter too. Claim 3 is a personal anecdote—one example of one person doesn't prove a rule for everyone. Claim 4 ("it'll be fun") is just an opinion. Overall, this argument is friendly but not well-supported. Your friend would need real evidence—like statistics about height and basketball performance, or your own interest in the sport—to make a strong case.

Question 5: Problem 5 — Critical Thinking

Think about a time you heard someone (a teacher, a family member, someone on TV, or a friend) try to convince you of something. Describe the argument they made and at least one claim. Was that claim supported by evidence? If it was, what kind of evidence did they use? If it wasn't, what kind of evidence could they have used to make it stronger? Write at least 3–4 sentences explaining your thinking.
Show answer
There's no single correct answer here—this is about your thinking! Here's an example of a strong response: "Last week, my mom told me I should eat breakfast every day because it helps me focus at school. Her claim was that breakfast improves focus. She didn't give me specific evidence—she just said she read it somewhere once. To make her argument stronger, she could have shown me a study or statistic, like research from a university that tested how students perform with and without breakfast. Her claim is probably true, but without evidence, I can't know for sure." If your answer includes the argument, at least one claim, a judgment about whether it's supported, and a suggestion for what evidence could help—you're doing amazing work! This kind of thinking is exactly what critical listeners do every day.

Summary

Lesson Summary

Summary

In this lesson, you learned how to delineate (break down) a speaker's argument—the big idea they want you to believe—and identify the individual claims they make to support it. You practiced the four-step evaluation process: find the argument, identify the claims, check for reasons, and look for evidence. You now know that strong evidence includes things like research studies, statistics, and expert opinions, while weak or missing evidence includes personal opinions, anecdotes, and phrases like "everyone knows that."

The most important takeaway is this: not all claims are created equal. A supported claim has clear, verifiable evidence behind it, while an unsupported claim is just an opinion disguised as a fact. By learning to tell the difference, you become a critical listener—someone who thinks carefully about what they hear instead of just accepting it. This skill will serve you in school, in conversations, and throughout your entire life. Keep practicing, keep questioning, and keep looking for the evidence!

Varsity Tutors • 6th Grade English Language Arts (Common Core) • Evaluating a Speaker's Argument and Claims