- Look at this student's opinion writing.
Our town should improve the neighborhood park. The playground has old equipment, and some parts are broken. When families visit, they sometimes leave because there is not much to do. If the city adds new swings and a safe climbing area, more kids can play without getting hurt. The park also needs more trash cans, because litter ends up on the grass. Cleaner spaces help animals and make the park nicer for everyone. Adding a few benches would give grandparents and parents a place to rest while watching children.
The paragraph stops after the last reason and needs a conclusion. Which sentence would provide the BEST conclusion for this opinion essay?
Answer: For all these reasons, the city should repair and update the park soon so it is safer and cleaner for everyone.
The best conclusion restates the writer's opinion in new words and reminds readers why it matters. The sentence beginning "For all these reasons" does this: it signals that the essay is ending, repeats the main idea (the city should fix the park) in fresh wording, and points to the benefits of a safer, cleaner park. That gives the essay a complete, finished feeling.
The sentence about the park being near your house and going with friends is only a personal detail. It does not restate the opinion or wrap up the argument. The sentence about adding a swimming pool and a roller coaster introduces brand-new ideas the essay never argued for, so it does not conclude anything. The sentence saying parks are important and towns take care of them sounds general and could fit almost any topic; it never restates THIS essay's opinion about improving THIS town's park. A strong conclusion must tie back to the argument you actually made.
- Read this student's opinion essay.
Students should join an after-school club or activity. Clubs help kids make new friends, especially if they are shy. Activities also teach skills, like drawing in art club or solving problems in robotics. Being part of a group can help students feel connected to school and want to attend. Some kids worry activities will be too hard, but many clubs welcome beginners and help them learn. After-school programs can also be a safe place to stay until families get off work. That's my opinion.
Which conclusion is MOST effective because it restates the opinion, summarizes key reasons, and gives a sense of closure?
Answer: For these reasons, joining a club is a great choice. Clubs build friendships, teach skills, and help kids feel connected.
The best ending is the one starting "For these reasons." It restates the writer's opinion in fresh words, reminds readers of the three main reasons (friendships, skills, feeling connected), and gives a clear sense of closure. That is exactly what a strong conclusion does.
The choice about clubs being required and meeting late is off track: it adds a brand-new demand the essay never argued, instead of pulling the reasons together. The snack-and-chores sentence describes the writer's afternoon routine, which has nothing to do with the opinion or its reasons, so it gives no closure. The "that is honestly just my own personal opinion" sentence only repeats that it IS an opinion; it never restates WHAT the opinion is or summarizes any reason, so readers are left without a real wrap-up.
Remember: a conclusion should say your opinion again in new words and briefly remind readers of your main reasons.
- Read this student's opinion essay.
I believe families should adopt pets from animal shelters instead of buying them from stores. Shelters are full of animals that need safe homes and kind owners. Adoption fees are often lower than store prices, and many pets are already vaccinated. When a family adopts, it also opens space in the shelter for another animal to be cared for. Some people think shelter pets are not well behaved, but many are trained and just need patience. Adopting can also teach kids responsibility because they help feed and walk the pet. Animals need help.
Which choice is the BEST conclusion that connects to the specific opinion and adds a call to action?
Answer: For all these reasons, adopting from a shelter is the best way to get a pet. Visit a local shelter or share adoption events so more animals can find homes.
The best conclusion restates the essay's exact opinion in fresh words—that adopting from a shelter is the best way to get a pet—and adds a clear call to action telling readers what to do: visit a local shelter or share adoption events. This gives the essay closure and connects straight back to helping animals find homes.
The choice about pets coming in many colors sounds friendly, but it drifts to a random detail about color and never restates the shelter-adoption opinion or tells readers to do anything. The choice saying animals everywhere need help is too vague—it could end almost any animal essay and gives no specific action, so it does not wrap up THIS argument. The choice about buying from stores is wrong because it argues the opposite of the writer's opinion, so it cannot be the conclusion to this essay at all.
Remember: a strong conclusion restates YOUR opinion in new words and tells readers exactly what to do next.
- Read this student's opinion essay.
I believe our neighborhood park should be improved with better lighting and repaired walking paths. Right now, some lights are broken, and the park feels unsafe when it gets dark. Cracked paths can cause people to trip, especially older neighbors and little kids. If the park feels safer, more families will use it for exercise and fresh air. Some people may think repairs take too long, but the city can fix one section at a time. A better park can bring the community together because people will want to spend time there.
Which sentence would provide the BEST concluding statement for this essay?
Answer: For these reasons, the city should repair the paths and fix the lighting so more neighbors can safely enjoy our park together.
The best conclusion pulls the essay's ideas together and reminds readers of the main point. "For these reasons, the city should repair the paths and fix the lighting so more neighbors can safely enjoy our park together" does this well: it uses concluding words ("For these reasons"), restates the opinion in fresh words, makes a call to action, and ends with a final thought about the whole neighborhood benefiting.
The choice about a snack shop and water slide is wrong because it adds brand-new reasons instead of wrapping up. A conclusion should close your argument, not start new ideas the essay never discussed.
The choice describing grass, trees, and a playground is a general fact about parks. It does not restate this writer's opinion or reasons, so it does not conclude anything.
The choice saying "this plan is a really good idea" and "that is all" is weak because it just fills space. It does not summarize the reasons or give the reader a real closing thought, so it feels empty. Only the correct choice truly finishes the argument.
- Read this opinion paragraph.
I think our school should give students less homework on weeknights. Many kids have sports, music lessons, or family chores after school. When homework takes too long, students stay up late and feel tired the next day. Studies and doctors say sleep helps our brains remember what we learn. If teachers assign shorter practice, students can still review skills without feeling stressed. Some people believe more homework always means more learning, but too much work can cause rushing and careless mistakes. Less homework can help students do better work and have time to read for fun. That is why I think our school should give students less homework on weeknights.
Which conclusion best restates the opinion in a new way and provides better closure?
Answer: For these reasons, cutting back on weeknight homework would help students sleep more and learn better. It would also leave time for activities and careful work at home.
The best conclusion restates the opinion in fresh words and reminds readers of the main reasons. The winning choice does this: it opens with "For these reasons," says "cutting back on weeknight homework" instead of copying the original words, and sums up the key benefits—more sleep, better learning, time for activities, and careful work. That gives the paragraph real closure.
The choice that only explains what homework is stays off topic; it defines a word instead of wrapping up the writer's opinion. The choice that copies "That is why I think our school should give students less homework on weeknights" word-for-word just repeats the thesis and adds a fact about weeknights—it never restates the idea in a new way. The choice about starting school later and lengthening lunch adds brand-new opinions the paragraph never argued, so it does not conclude this piece; a good ending pulls together the reasons already given rather than introducing fresh ones.
- Read this student's opinion writing about reading.
I think students should read for at least twenty minutes every day. Reading often helps build vocabulary, so hard words become easier over time. It can also improve writing, because readers notice how authors use details and strong sentences. Reading is also a great way to learn facts about history, science, and other places. Some students say reading is boring, but choosing a book about your favorite topic can make it exciting. Libraries and classrooms have many kinds of books, like comics, mysteries, and biographies. Also, reading every day can help you fall asleep faster at night.
The last sentence introduces a new reason instead of concluding. Which conclusion would work BEST to restate the opinion and provide closure?
Answer: In conclusion, daily reading is a smart habit for students to build. It grows vocabulary, improves writing, and helps us learn new information in a fun way.
The best conclusion says "In conclusion," then restates the opinion in new words ("daily reading is a smart habit") and quickly reminds readers of the main reasons—it grows vocabulary, improves writing, and helps you learn—ending on a positive note. That wraps up the whole piece and gives a sense of closure.
The choice about reading before bed to fall asleep is wrong because it adds a brand-new reason instead of summarizing the reasons already given—exactly the mistake the last sentence made.
The choice about books being printed on paper and taking weeks to finish is off-topic; it never restates the opinion or the reasons for reading daily.
The choice telling everyone to read comics, mysteries, and biographies only repeats one small detail from the middle of the writing. It picks up a single example instead of restating the main opinion and summarizing the key reasons, so it does not truly conclude the piece.
- Read this opinion paragraph.
I believe families should try to reduce food waste at home. When we throw away food, all the water and energy used to grow it are wasted too. In the United States, a lot of food is thrown out even though it is still safe to eat. One easy way to help is planning meals and making a shopping list. Another way is saving leftovers for lunch the next day. Composting fruit peels and vegetable scraps can also keep trash out of landfills. If we waste less food, we save money and help the Earth. So we should help the Earth.
Which conclusion best restates the opinion in a new way and provides better closure?
Answer: For all these reasons, cutting down on food waste is a smart choice for families. By planning meals, using leftovers, and composting scraps, we can save money and protect the planet.
This question tests 5th grade opinion writing: providing a concluding statement or section related to the opinion presented (CCSS.W.5.1.d). Strong opinion writing conclusions RESTATE the opinion in new words (not copying from introduction), SUMMARIZE the key reasons briefly (remind readers of 2-3 main points), may include a CALL TO ACTION (what readers should do), and provide FINAL THOUGHT about importance or impact. Good conclusions give a sense of CLOSURE—they feel complete and use concluding language (For these reasons, In conclusion, Therefore, Ultimately). Choice B is correct because it uses strong transition language ('For all these reasons'), restates the opinion in new words ('cutting down on food waste is a smart choice'), summarizes specific strategies mentioned in the essay (planning meals, using leftovers, composting), and provides a final thought about dual benefits (save money and protect the planet). This makes an effective conclusion by connecting all the reasons together and showing the broader impact of the opinion. Choice A is weak because it's too vague ('help the Earth') without restating the specific opinion about food waste or summarizing any of the concrete reasons given, showing the common error where students write generic conclusions that could fit any environmental topic. To help students: Use transition words - For these reasons, In conclusion, Therefore, Ultimately. Watch for: vague statements ('this is good'), conclusions about different topic, no closure or finality.
- Read this student's opinion writing.
I think our school should take more field trips during the year. Field trips help students learn by seeing real places, like museums and science centers. When we connect lessons to the real world, we remember information longer. Field trips also teach students how to behave responsibly in public. Some people say field trips are too expensive, but the school can choose nearby places or ask for volunteers. Even one extra trip each semester could make learning more exciting. We should go on more field trips during the year.
The last sentence is an identical restatement of the opinion. Which conclusion best restates the opinion in a new way and summarizes key reasons?
Answer: In conclusion, adding more field trips would make school learning come alive. Seeing real places helps us remember lessons and practice responsibility outside the classroom.
The best conclusion restates the opinion in fresh words and reminds readers of the main reasons. The correct choice does this: it says field trips 'make school learning come alive' instead of copying the opening, and it summarizes two reasons—remembering lessons and practicing responsibility. That gives the writing a strong sense of closure.
The choice that simply repeats 'our school should take more field trips during the year' does not restate the opinion in a new way; it echoes the original opening almost word for word and adds no summary of reasons. The choice about sitting on the bus with friends only mentions one small, off-topic detail that was never a reason in the writing, so it does not summarize the real key points. The choice about serving tacos on Fridays changes the topic completely to cafeteria food, so it cannot conclude an opinion about field trips. Only the first choice both rephrases the opinion and pulls the key reasons together.
- Read this student's opinion writing.
"I believe everyone should try to reduce food waste at home. When people throw away food, all the water and energy used to grow it are wasted too. Food scraps in landfills can create gases that are bad for the environment. Families can plan meals, save leftovers, and freeze food before it goes bad. Some people think one family cannot make a difference, but many small actions add up. Reducing waste can also save money because you buy only what you will use. So we should help the Earth."
Which conclusion would be the BEST replacement for the last sentence because it is too vague?
Answer: Clearly, cutting down on food waste is a simple way to protect the environment and save money for your family.
The best replacement restates the opinion in fresh words ("cutting down on food waste is a simple way"), reminds readers of two key reasons from the writing (protecting the environment and saving money), and wraps up the topic with strong closure. That is exactly what a good conclusion does. The choice about helping the world every day sounds like a conclusion but stays just as vague as the sentence you are replacing—it never mentions food waste or the reasons, so it could end almost any essay. The choice about how food tastes is off-topic; it talks about flavor instead of the opinion about reducing waste. The choice about banning all grocery stores is an extreme, unrealistic idea that does not summarize the writer's reasons and would not actually work as a conclusion. Only one option restates the specific opinion and its reasons, so it is the clear winner.
- Read this student's opinion essay.
I think our school should have fewer homework assignments on weekends. Weekends are a time for families to be together and for kids to rest. When students have too much homework, they feel stressed and cannot enjoy sports or hobbies. Some homework is helpful, but long packets can take hours to finish. Many teachers already teach important skills during the week, so weekends should not feel like extra school days. If students rest more, they may return on Monday ready to learn. I think our school should have fewer homework assignments on weekends.
The last sentence is weak because it repeats the opinion exactly. Which revision creates a stronger conclusion?
Answer: For these reasons, our school should cut back on weekend homework so students can rest and enjoy family time. Teachers could assign shorter practice so Monday starts strong.
The strongest conclusion is the one beginning "For these reasons." It uses concluding language, restates the opinion in fresh words ("cut back on weekend homework"), reminds readers of the main reasons (rest and family time), and offers a helpful next step. That gives the essay a real sense of closure.
The choice about the school and how the writer feels just repeats the opening opinion in longer words without summarizing reasons or adding a next step, so it brings no closure. The choice saying weekend homework "is bad" and "everyone clearly agrees" states an opinion but uses absolute, unsupported claims instead of summarizing the essay's reasons. The choice about walking and feeding pets adds a brand-new idea that the essay never discussed, so it wanders off topic instead of wrapping up. Only the "For these reasons" revision does the job of a true conclusion.
- Read this opinion writing.
"I think families should adopt pets from animal shelters instead of buying them from stores. Shelters are full of dogs and cats that need safe homes. Adoption fees are often lower than buying a pet, and many pets are already vaccinated. When you adopt, you also help the shelter have space for another animal. Some people worry shelter pets are not friendly, but many are gentle and just need patience. Adopting can teach kids responsibility because they help feed, walk, and care for the pet. Animals need help."
The conclusion is too vague. Which revision most clearly connects to the opinion and summarizes the reasons?
Answer: In conclusion, adopting from a shelter is a kind choice that saves animals and helps families too. It costs less, gives pets a second chance, and supports shelters that are overcrowded.
The best conclusion restates the opinion in fresh words and reminds readers of the main reasons. The choice about adopting being a kind choice does this: it says shelter adoption saves animals and helps families, then sums up three reasons from the essay—it costs less, gives pets a second chance, and supports overcrowded shelters. That gives the writing a strong, complete ending.
The ending that says animals need help and people should be kind is too vague. It never mentions the opinion about shelter adoption or the specific reasons, so it could fit almost any animal topic.
The one about pets being cute and liking fish more than dogs drifts off-topic. Personal favorites have nothing to do with the argument for adopting from shelters.
The one saying shelters should be bigger and the city should build one on every street adds a brand-new idea instead of summarizing the writer's reasons. A conclusion should wrap up the points already made, not introduce new demands.
Only the first choice restates the opinion and pulls the reasons together, so it is the clear answer.
- Read this student's opinion essay.
I think students should limit screen time on school nights. When I stare at a screen too long, my eyes feel tired and I get headaches. Screens can also keep us awake because bright light makes it harder to feel sleepy. If we go to bed late, we have trouble paying attention in class the next day. Limiting screen time also gives us time to do other healthy things, like reading or talking with family. Some people say screens help them relax, but you can relax by drawing or listening to music too. Exercise is important. The end.
The ending is abrupt and does not connect to the opinion. Which revision creates a stronger conclusion?
Answer: In conclusion, using screens less on school nights helps students sleep, focus, and feel better. We should put devices away early so we are ready to learn tomorrow.
The best conclusion pulls the essay together. The winning choice restates the opinion in new words, sums up the main reasons (sleep, focus, feeling better), and adds a call to action about putting devices away early. That gives readers a clear sense of closure tied to the essay's argument.
The choice about exercise sounds finished, but it wraps up a topic the essay never really argued—this essay is about limiting screen time, not about exercising. The choice about video games being expensive brings in a brand-new idea that was never one of the writer's reasons, so it does not conclude anything the essay said. The choice about liking screens because they are fun actually argues the opposite of the writer's opinion, so it cannot be a strong ending for this essay. Only the first choice restates and supports the essay's real opinion, so it is the correct answer.
- Read this student's opinion writing.
"I believe our school should have a longer recess every day. Right now we only get about 20 minutes, and it feels rushed. When recess is short, many kids barely finish their snack before the bell rings. Longer recess also helps students move their bodies, which is important for health. Teachers often say we focus better after we get fresh air and exercise. Another reason is that recess helps us practice sharing and solving problems with friends. If we have more time to play, fewer arguments start because people do not feel hurried. Some kids also need extra time to calm down when they feel upset. A longer recess could make the classroom quieter and help learning go smoother. That is why I think our school should have a longer recess every day."
The last sentence is weak because it repeats the opinion exactly. Which revision creates a stronger conclusion?
Answer: For these reasons, extending recess time would help our whole school. It would improve our health, help friendships, and make it easier to focus in class.
The best conclusion says the opinion in fresh words instead of copying it, reminds readers of the main reasons, and signals the ending. The winning choice does all three: it restates the idea as "extending recess time would help our whole school," sums up the three key reasons (health, friendships, and focus), and opens with "For these reasons" to give a sense of closure.
The choice about wanting more homework starts like a conclusion but drifts off the topic by adding a brand-new opinion the writing never argued. The choice that says the writer "really really" wants recess just repeats the opinion in wordy language without summarizing any reasons, so it stays as weak as the original ending. The choice about the large playground gives a detail, but it never restates the opinion or wraps up the argument, so it does not conclude anything. Only one choice pulls the reasons together and closes the piece.
- Read this opinion writing.
"I believe families should limit screen time on school nights. When kids stare at screens too long, it can be harder to fall asleep. Doctors say sleep helps our brains learn and remember new information. Too much screen time can also cause headaches and make our eyes feel tired. If we turn off devices earlier, we have more time to read, talk, or get ready for the next day. Some people think screens help them relax, but there are other relaxing activities, like drawing or listening to music. Limiting screens can help everyone feel calmer and more rested. Exercise is important. The end."
Which conclusion best restates the opinion in a new way and provides better closure?
Answer: For all these reasons, turning screens off earlier on school nights is a smart choice. Better sleep, healthier eyes, and more family time help kids do their best in school.
The best conclusion restates the main opinion in fresh words—"turning screens off earlier on school nights is a smart choice"—and briefly sums up the writer's key reasons: better sleep, healthier eyes, and more family time. The phrase "For all these reasons" signals a strong ending, and connecting the benefits to doing well in school gives the reader a satisfying sense of closure.
The choice about video games staying up late adds a brand-new reason that was never in the essay and misreads the argument, so it does not truly restate what the writer said. The choice about companies making new games and apps drifts to a different topic and never mentions limiting screens or the writer's opinion at all. The choice saying screens "matter" and families should "maybe make some rules" sounds like an ending, but it is too vague—it never restates the actual opinion or reminds readers of the reasons, so it gives weak closure. Only the first choice restates the opinion in new words, summarizes the reasons, and closes the essay clearly.
- Read this student's opinion writing.
I think teachers should give less homework on weekends. Weekends are a time for families to spend time together and rest. If students have too much homework, they may rush and not learn the material well. Kids also need time to play outside, exercise, and help at home. Some people say homework teaches responsibility, but students can still practice responsibility on school nights. When students return on Monday feeling rested, they can focus better in class. These are my reasons.
Which conclusion includes the BEST restatement and sense of closure?
Answer: To conclude, weekend homework should be lighter so students can rest and still learn well, giving kids more time for family, exercise, and careful studying so they return ready to succeed.
The best conclusion restates the opinion in fresh words ("weekend homework should be lighter" instead of "give less homework"), briefly sums up the main reasons (rest, family, exercise, careful studying), and adds a final thought about the payoff (returning "ready to succeed"). That gives the writing a real sense of closure. The choice about homework being hard for some and easy for others does not restate the opinion at all—it introduces a new, unsure idea instead of wrapping up the argument. The choice about longer Monday lunches adds a brand-new topic that was never part of the writing, so it drifts away from the opinion instead of closing it. The choice that just says "These are my reasons" only repeats the passage's weak ending and stretches it out; it still never restates the opinion in new words or summarizes the actual reasons, so it leaves the writing feeling unfinished. Only the conclusion that restates, summarizes, and looks forward truly finishes the argument.
- Read this opinion essay.
"I think our city should improve the neighborhood park. The playground equipment is old, and some parts are broken. New swings and safer slides would help younger kids play without getting hurt. Adding more trash cans could also keep the park cleaner, since litter is often on the ground. A few benches would give grandparents and parents a place to sit and watch. Some people say improvements cost too much, but parks are important for health and community. If the park looks nicer, more families will spend time outside together."
Which sentence would provide the BEST conclusion for this opinion essay?
Answer: For these reasons, the city should update the park so it is safer and cleaner for everyone. If neighbors speak up at city meetings, we can create a place where families enjoy spending time together.
The best conclusion restates the opinion in fresh words (the city should update the park), reminds readers of the main points (safer and cleaner), gives a realistic call to action (neighbors speaking up at city meetings), and ends with a hopeful final thought about families enjoying the park. That gives the essay a real sense of closure.
The choice that says the writer is finished only announces that the essay is over. It never restates the opinion or summarizes the reasons, so it does not truly conclude anything.
The choice describing grass, trees, flowers, and paths just lists general facts about parks. It never returns to the writer's opinion or reasons, so it drifts off topic instead of wrapping up the argument.
The choice about a roller coaster and water park adds brand-new, unrealistic ideas that were never in the essay. A conclusion should pull the existing argument together, not introduce big new demands, so this one does not fit.
- Read this student's opinion essay.
I believe our school should have a longer recess every day. Right now, recess feels too short to run, play, and cool down. When kids do not move enough, they get restless and have trouble focusing in class. A longer recess also helps students solve small problems on the playground instead of arguing later. Some people worry that more recess means less learning time, but students learn better after a real break. Finally, longer recess gives everyone time to include new friends in games, not just the fastest runners. That is why I think our school should have a longer recess every day.
The last sentence is weak because it just repeats the opinion. Which revision creates a stronger conclusion?
Answer: For these reasons, adding more recess time would help our whole school. Students would return to class calmer, healthier, and ready to learn, so the principal should consider this change.
A strong conclusion should restate the opinion in fresh words, remind readers of the main reasons, and give a sense of closure. The best answer does all three: it says 'adding more recess time would help our whole school' instead of copying the opening line, it sums up the key benefits (calmer, healthier, ready to learn), and it ends with a clear call to action for the principal. The option that just repeats 'our school should have a longer recess every day' twice adds no new wording, no summary, and no closure—it commits the exact problem the question points out. The choice about recess being 'really fun' and 'the best part of the whole school day' only shares one feeling and never restates the reasons or wraps up the argument. The choice about buying 'brand new playground equipment' drifts to a brand-new topic that was never in the essay, so it cannot conclude this argument. Only one choice truly restates, summarizes, and closes.
- Read this student's opinion writing.
I think kids should limit screen time on school nights. When I stare at a screen for too long, my eyes feel tired and my head can hurt. Screens can also keep kids awake because the light makes it harder to feel sleepy. If students go to bed late, they may feel grumpy and have trouble paying attention the next day. Some kids say they need screens to relax, but reading, drawing, or talking with family can also be relaxing. Limiting screens leaves more time for homework and getting ready for the next day. Exercise is important. The end.
The ending is abrupt and does not connect to the opinion. Which revision creates a stronger conclusion?
Answer: In conclusion, cutting back on screens during school nights helps kids sleep better and focus more in class. Choosing other calm activities helps us feel healthier and ready for school.
The best ending wraps up the writer's opinion about limiting screen time. It uses the closing phrase "In conclusion," restates the opinion in new words, reminds readers of the main reasons (better sleep and focus), and adds a final thought about being healthier and ready for school. That gives the writing a real sense of closure.
The sentence about screens coming in many sizes and being brighter just adds a new detail about screens. It never restates the opinion or sums up any reasons, so it does not conclude anything.
The sentence about playing video games longer on weekends argues the opposite of the writer's opinion. A conclusion should support the opinion, not switch to a new one.
The sentence about exercising every day stays off-topic, just like the original ending. It talks about a different subject and still stops with "The end," so it does not tie back to screen time or feel finished.
- Read this student's opinion essay.
I believe our school should have a longer recess every day. Right now, recess feels rushed, and many kids barely start a game before the whistle blows. Longer recess helps our bodies because running and climbing are real exercise. Doctors say kids need about 60 minutes of activity each day, and recess can help. It also helps our brains because we come back calmer and more ready to learn. When we get to move, we wiggle less during math and reading. Some people worry longer recess takes away learning time, but focused students learn faster. Recess also helps friendships because we can solve problems and practice taking turns. That is why I think our school should have a longer recess every day.
The last sentence is weak because it just repeats the opinion. Which revision creates a stronger conclusion?
Answer: For these reasons, extending recess would help students stay healthy, focus better, and build friendships. I hope our principal will consider adding more recess time so we can learn our best.
The strongest conclusion does three things: it restates the opinion in new words, it briefly reminds readers of the main reasons, and it ends with a clear final thought. The best answer restates the opinion as 'extending recess would help students,' sums up all three reasons from the essay (staying healthy, focusing better, building friendships), and adds a call to action asking the principal to consider it. That gives the essay a complete, satisfying ending.
The choice that begins 'For these reasons, our school should have a longer recess' just copies the opening opinion word-for-word and adds a detail; it repeats instead of summarizing, which is the same weak move the stem points out. The choice starting 'In conclusion, longer recess would be a good idea' sounds like a conclusion but never mentions the essay's reasons, so it feels empty. The choice beginning 'Ultimately' adds a brand-new point about buying snacks that was never argued in the essay, so it does not wrap up the ideas the writer actually gave. Only the best answer reviews the real reasons and closes the argument.
- Look at this student's opinion writing.
I think our town should add more recycling bins in public places like parks and sidewalks. Many people buy snacks and drinks, and then they cannot find a bin nearby. When trash is left on the ground, it can wash into storm drains and end up in rivers. Recycling bins can also remind people to sort plastic, paper, and cans instead of throwing everything away. Some people say bins cost money, but cleaning up litter also costs money and time. More bins would make our community look cleaner for everyone who visits.
The paragraph ends without a conclusion. Which sentence would provide the BEST concluding statement?
Answer: For all these reasons, our town should place more recycling bins in busy areas. If we add bins and use them, we can cut down on litter and protect our rivers.
The best conclusion wraps up the whole argument. The sentence starting with "For all these reasons" restates the opinion in new words (place bins in busy areas), reminds readers of the main points (less litter, cleaner rivers), and tells readers what to do. That gives the paragraph a complete, finished feeling.
The choice about people not liking to walk far adds a brand-new reason instead of wrapping up. A conclusion should pull ideas together, not introduce something new. The choice saying recycling helps keep the Earth clean is true, but it is too general—it never restates this writer's specific opinion about adding bins in town, so it could end almost any recycling essay. The choice about parks being fun places to play drifts off topic; it talks about playing with friends instead of the argument for more recycling bins. Only the "For all these reasons" sentence actually concludes THIS opinion.
